Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Randomized-controlled trial to compare early radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access among ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Full description
Conventional transradial access (TRA) is recommended as the default approach for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to 2018 ESC guidelines. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains the frequent complication, precluding the future use of the radial artery as an access point for repeat coronary recanalization or as a conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery. More than 50% of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) present multiple vascular lesions, of which 50% require reprocessing non-culprit vessels. Therefore, the patency of the radial artery is crucial for STEMI patients. The distal radial access (DRA), located in the anatomical snuffbox or the dorsum of the hand, was introduced as a promising alternative. Three recent RCTs have shown significant reductions of RAO after DRA compared with TRA. Nevertheless, all of them excluded the patients presenting with STEMI. Therefore, we conduct a prospective, single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial to assess the superiority of preventing RAO at 24 h via DRA when compared TRA among STEMI patients for primary PCI.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
512 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jincheng Guo
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal