ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Distraction vs Interposition Arthroplasty for Basilar Thumb Osteoarthritis

A

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Thumb Osteoarthritis

Treatments

Procedure: Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty
Procedure: Interposition Arthroplasty

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04155853
597/2019

Details and patient eligibility

About

Surgical management for osteoarthritis of the thumb is indicated when conservative measures have failed, and numerous techniques have been proposed. Distraction arthroplasty has been the gold standard due to lack of high quality evidence, which renders the benefits or harms of other techniques uncertain. The other treatment alternatives share at least partial excision of the trapezium, and include ligament reconstruction alone or with tendon interposition, allograft interposition arthroplasty, prosthetic implants and arthrodesis. A recent promising technique is the pillow technique, a type of interposition arthroplasty, which utilizes a fascia lata allograft as interposition material and stabilization with a K-wire.

In view of the low quality evidence regarding the use of interposition material versus distraction arthroplasty alone, the investigators will compare the two methods in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that interposition arthroplasty using the pillow technique yields better results in terms of functional improvement and grip strength when compared to the hematoma and distraction technique. The confirmation of the hypothesis is going to justify the use of the fascia lata in the procedure. On the contrary, if the pillow technique fails to yield clinically meaningful results, the recommendation of the hematoma and distraction technique will account for reducing the overall cost of the procedure, rendering the allograft redundant.

Full description

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease of the joints, mostly known for the hip and the knee. Osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint is a common cause for pain, stiffness and grip weakness of the hand, affecting one of three females and one of eight males. Surgical management is indicated when conservative measures have failed, and numerous techniques have been proposed. Distraction arthroplasty has been the gold standard due to lack of high quality evidence, which renders the benefits or harms of other techniques uncertain. A recent Cochrane review was unable to demonstrate whether any technique confers a benefit over distraction arthroplasty and noted that the quality of evidence was low.

Hematoma arthroplasty includes trapeziectomy without interposition of any material or ligament reconstruction. Later, the same technique with the addition of a temporary K-wire stabilization of the first metacarpal has been described it as hematoma and distraction arthroplasty. They immobilized the metacarpal in an overcorrected position to avoid postoperative weakness, assuming the causative factor was the subsidence of the metacarpal into the trapezial void, and they reported improved outcomes. The other treatment alternatives share at least partial excision of the trapezium, and include ligament reconstruction alone or with tendon interposition, allograft interposition arthroplasty, prosthetic implants and arthrodesis. A recent promising technique is the pillow technique, a type of interposition arthroplasty, which utilizes a fascia lata allograft as interposition material and stabilization with a K-wire. The technique showed promising results in a long-term follow-up study, and proved to be a viable alternative to distraction arthroplasty with no donor site morbidity and better preservation of the height of the metacarpal. However, there is no robust evidence that retaining the joint space affects the functional results or the grip strength of the patients.

Aim of the study In view of the low quality evidence regarding the use of interposition material versus distraction arthroplasty alone, the investigators will compare the two methods in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that interposition arthroplasty using the pillow technique yields better results in terms of functional improvement and grip strength when compared to the hematoma and distraction technique. The confirmation of the hypothesis is going to justify the use of the fascia lata in the procedure, which is one option widely utilized. On the contrary, if the pillow technique fails to yield clinically meaningful results, the recommendation of the hematoma and distraction technique will account for reducing the overall cost of the procedure, rendering the allograft redundant.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice.

Enrollment

22 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis Stage III and IV according to the Eaton and Littler classification
  • At least one month history of pain refractory to nonoperative treatment (rest, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine, splint, hand therapy, a maximum of three corticosteroid injections)
  • Patient willing to participate to the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous operation to the affected area
  • Pregnant patient
  • Chronic systemic illnesses

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

22 participants in 2 patient groups

Interposition Arthroplasty
Active Comparator group
Description:
Fascia lata interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis
Treatment:
Procedure: Interposition Arthroplasty
Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty
Active Comparator group
Description:
Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis
Treatment:
Procedure: Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems