The specific aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of chewing gum on the return of bowel function in a group of patients undergoing spinal surgery with a group of matched controls that do not receive any chewing gum. A 24-hour reduction in time to passage of first flatus will be considered an important clinical difference.
The research questions are:
- Does providing chewing gum post-operatively hasten the return of bowel function?
- Does providing chewing gum post-operatively reduced overall length of stay?
- Does providing chewing gum post-operatively have any associated complications?
- Does providing chewing gum post-operatively result in higher objective outcomes scores?
The secondary aims are:
- To compare hospital length of stay between the groups with a mean of ½ day considered clinically important.
- To compare time until tolerating regular diet as defined as two consecutive meals with no complications with 24 hours considered statistically significant.
- To compare incidence and nature of complications between the two groups.
- To compare the time until completion of rehab milestones with 1 day being considered clinically important.
- To compare the requirement for nutrition evaluations
- To compare SF-12 scores as a marker of patient satisfaction with a difference of 10 points or more measured between the two groups upon discharge from hospital and at six-weeks after surgery.