Does Laryngoscopic Tecnique Facilitate cLMA Insertion?

Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital

Status and phase: Unknown; Phase 4

Conditions: Urologic Surgery

Treatments: Other: Comparison of fibreoptic view

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02000791

laryngeal mask

Details and patient eligibility

About

it is compared that laryngeal mask insertion with standard technique and laryngoscopic technique

Full description

Is there any releation between insertion succes rate and difficult intubation criteria. success of the first attempt laryngeal mask insertion, patient response of laryngeal mask placement. And also during the implementation of these two techniques; the effects on heart rate and blood pressure and postoperative complications were investigated.

Enrollment: 180 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Over 18 age
• under urologic surgery patient

Exclusion criteria

• Uper respiratory infection
• Full stomach
• BMI over 40

Trial design

Primary purpose: Diagnostic

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

180 participants in 2 patient groups

cLMA insertion via laryngoscopic technique

Experimental group

Description:

Comparison of cLMA insertion via laryngoscope view by fiberscope

Treatment:

Other: Comparison of fibreoptic view

cLMA insertion via standart technique

Active Comparator group

Description:

Comparison of cLMA insertion via standart technique view by fiberscope

Treatment:

Other: Comparison of fibreoptic view