Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

Status: Completed

Conditions: Postoperative Complications; Migration of Implant; Relapse; Pain

Treatments: Procedure: eTEP group; Procedure: TEP group

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06070207

55555555555

Details and patient eligibility

About

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate.

One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation.

There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. These studies are generally planned for unilateral hernias. It is a controversial issue among surgeons that the possibility of mesh migration is higher in bilateral hernias since there is a larger dissection area. This discussion is the starting point of this study. There were no studies in the literature regarding mesh fixation in bilateral inguinal hernias. The aim of this study is to compare bilateral inguinal hernia patients with and without mesh fixation in the eTEP technique in terms of both mesh migration and clinical features.

Enrollment: 40 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with bilateral inguinal hernias.
• Patients aged 18-65.

Exclusion criteria

• Younger than 18 years, and older than 65 years
• Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
• Recurrent hernias.
• Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias.
• Patients who are contraindicated to receive general anesthesia.
• Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

40 participants in 2 patient groups

TEP Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

In 20 patients; Bilateral inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the TEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will not be fixed. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Treatment:

Procedure: TEP group

eTEP Group

Experimental group

Description:

In 20 patients; Bilateral inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will not be fixed. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Treatment:

Procedure: eTEP group