Ambu
Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study is to make a health economic evaluation comparing novice physicians use of VivaSight double-lumen tube and a conventional double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery at a teaching hospital. The hypothesis is, that both double-lumen tubes are equally cost-effective and the the incidence of fiberoptic bronchoscope use it the same for both tubes.
Full description
A randomized, controlled single-centre investigation comparing the VivaSight double-lumen tube and the conventional double-lumen tube at a teaching hospital. A pilot study including up to 10 subjects will be performed prior to the investigation is initiated. The investigation will include a total of 50 adult subjects (25 subjects in each group) admitted to the investigational site with established indication of single lung ventilation.
The objective of the investigation is to compare the number of times the tube position needs to be verified with a scope and relevant costs between VivaSight double lumen tube and conventional double lument tube in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
70 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal