Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
With the birth of Mechanical Ventilation in the 1950s came the ventilation induced lung injuries (VILI). Numerous works have since then shown the benefit of "protective ventilation", notably by controlling the delivered tidal volume and pressures. However, as the respiratory condition improves and the weaning is started by shifting to Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), these parameters stop being tightly controlled. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between the driving pressure measured in PSV and the weaning time.
Full description
Scientific justification :
As mechanical ventilation developed since the 1950s, researchers started to recognize characteristic lung disease associated with it, Nash et al giving an anatomopathological description of "Respiratory Lung" on post-mortem examination of lungs after mechanical ventilation in 1967 [2]. It progressively led to the concept of VILI and of the protective ventilation to minimize it, enhancing lower tidal volume and plateau pressure [3], controlled Driving Pressure < 15cmH2O[4], neuromuscular blockade[5] and prone positioning[6]. However, these parameters can only be controlled for sedated patients in Controlled Ventilation. As the respiratory conditions improve, the onset of spontaneous breathing uses PSV [7] but because pressure support is added to the inspiratory effort of the patient, tidal volume and driving pressure stop being tightly controlled. It is therefore possible for the driving pressure to be higher than 15 cmH2O in case of a major inspiratory effort. One ought to wonder whether a high driving pressure is associated with a prolonged weaning phase following a moderate to severe ARDS.
Strategy description:
Patients that enter the weaning phase following a moderate to severe ARDS equipped with a nasogastric allowing measures of EAdi will be included. Driving Pressure will be measured following the method used by Bellani et al [1]. A weaning test will be conducted daily.
Follow up description:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
45 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal