Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent for de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Ulsan University Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Unstable Angina

Stable Angina

Treatments

Device: Drug Coated Balloon

Device: Bare Metal Stent

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02456402

1111

Details and patient eligibility

About

This randomized trial will assess the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) compared to Bare Metal Stent (BMS) using Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance for de novo coronary artery lesions in patients unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy and at high risk of bleeding. Patients will be randomized after balloon angioplasty to receive either DCB or BMS. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months, and major adverse cardiac events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months.

Full description

Although the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has reduced in-stent restenosis when compared to bare metal stents (BMS) and decreased the incidence of adverse clinical events (1-2), DES therapy is limited by delayed arterial healing, late acquired malapposition and neo-atherosclerosis leading to an increased risk of late stent thrombosis and late restenosis (3-4). Conceptually, a permanent stent inhibits advantageous vascular remodeling and durable polymer provokes excessive inflammation (5). Non-stent based local drug delivery using paclitaxel-coated balloon has emerged as a new clinical treatment alternative by maintaining the anti-proliferative properties of DES (6). There is limited data on the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) treatment for de novo coronary lesions when compared to BMS. To avoid the risk of abrupt closure of target lesion after balloon angioplasty, a reliable predictor of coronary flow is necessary especially in de novo lesions of major coronary arteries. Therefore, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) after angioplasty as a good indicator of immediate functional improvement and reduced restenosis (7), the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of DCB treatment compared to BMS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

Patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with > 50% stenosis in a single vessel and at high risk of bleeding with the inability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) will be included in this trial. Patients will undergo balloon angioplasty and if the FFR post balloon angioplasty is > 0.80, they will be randomized to receive either DCB or BMS. Patients will receive Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) analysis at 9 months follow-up. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months and major adverse events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months and these endpoints will be compared between DCB and BMS groups.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Stable Angina and Unstable angina
single de novo coronary artery lesions in a single vessel with > 50% diameter stenosis with a reference diameter > 2.75mm
Patients at high risk of bleeding and whom cannot tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy for > 1 month are inclusion criteria for the study and are listed here:
Unexplained anemia
Atrial fibrillation with CHADSVASC > or equal to 1
Patients awaiting for non cardiac surgery within a year
History of massive hemorrhage requiring transfusion
History of upper GI bleeding
Malignancy
Poor compliance with medication

Exclusion criteria

STEMI/NSTEMI within the preceding 72 hours
Multivessel disease, chronic total occlusion, long lesions and left main disease
heart failure with ejection fraction < 35% and/or cardiogenic shock
Previous history of or planned coronary artery bypass grafting
life expectancy of less than 1 year