ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Dual and Single Switching Monopolar RFA Using Separable Clustered Electrode for Treatment of HCC

Seoul National University logo

Seoul National University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Treatments

Device: Separable clustered electrodes
Device: SSM
Device: DSM

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03699657
SNUH-2014-0279

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study was conducted to prospectively compare the efficacy, safety and mid-term outcomes of dual-switching monopolar (DSM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with those of conventional single-switching monopolar (SSM) RFA in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Full description

Recently, dual switching monopolar RFA (DSM-RFA) was developed to enhance further the efficiency of the single switching monopolar RFA (SSM-RFA) in creating ablation zone; Yoon et al. reported that DSM-RFA allowed significantly greater RF energy delivery to target tissue per given time, and then, created significantly larger ablation zone than the SSM-RFA in ex vivo and in vivo animal experiments. A retrospective comparative study by Choi et al. reported that the DSM-RFA created significantly larger ablation volume than, but seemed to show similar LTP rate to the SSM-RFA. Still, whether the physical differences between SSM-RFA and DSM-RFA translate into better clinical outcomes remains an open question. Regarding that the choice of equipment is an essential factor to consider in planning image-guided tumor ablation procedure, we thought that the prospective comparison between DSM-RFA and the SSM-RFA would be helpful for improving results of RFA.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy, safety and mid-term outcomes of DSM-RFA with those of conventional SSM-RFA in the treatment of HCC.

Enrollment

86 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with HCC (>= 1.5cm and < 5cm in maximal diameter) according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS on MDCT or liver MRI within 60 days before RFA
  • no history of previous locoregional treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • more than three HCC nodules
  • tumors abutting to the central portal vein or hepatic vein with a diameter > 5 mm
  • Child-Pugh class C
  • tumors with major vascular invasion
  • extrahepatic metastasis
  • severe coagulopathy (platelet cell count of less than 50,000 cells/mm3 or INR prolongation of more than 50 %)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

86 participants in 2 patient groups

RFA with DSM mode
Active Comparator group
Description:
RFA is performed in dual switching mode using a separable clustered electrode (Octopus®) and a three-channel dual-generator unit.
Treatment:
Device: Separable clustered electrodes
Device: DSM
RFA with SSM mode
Active Comparator group
Description:
RFA is performed in single switching mode using a separable clustered electrode (Octopus®) and a three-channel dual-generator unit.
Treatment:
Device: SSM
Device: Separable clustered electrodes

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems