Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
A switch strategy to investigate whether a dual therapy with Ritonavir-boosted (RTV) Darunavir (DRV) + Dolutegravir (DTG) over 48 weeks is non-inferior to a continuous standard of care therapy with RTV-boosted DRV in combination with 2 Nucleosidic Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in HIV patients, who are on a stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) with RTV-boosted DRV in combination with 2 NRTIs.
Full description
Modern combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) leads to well-controlled HIV infection with a potentially normal life expectancy. Nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) play a major role as "ART backbone" and are essential antiretroviral agents according to current European and WHO HIV treatment guidelines. However, NRTI use can be associated with substantial side effects, e.g. bone and kidney toxicity, lipotoxicity and mitochondrial toxicity and can put patients at serious risk. Especially long-term NRTI-exposure is a risk factor for these often cumulative side effects, since the standard of care (SOC) therapy with the different NRTIs consists of the combination of multiple substances. Furthermore NRTI resistances may emerge over time and limit treatment options for pre-treated HIV patients.
As a consequence, alternative NRTI free (so called "nuke sparing") therapy options have been evaluated in different studies but were associated with less virologic therapeutic success and higher rates of therapy induced resistance compared to standard regimens in ART naïve patients. This is particularly true for patients with a high baseline viral load.
As an alternative to NRTI-based therapy options, Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r)-based nuke-sparing dual therapies have been studied widely, mostly in combination with the integrase inhibitor (INI) Raltegravir (RAL). In this setting, the PI was not fully capable to prevent the development of INI resistant viruses.
The HIV protease inhibitor Darunavir (DRV) and the novel INI Dolutegravir (DTG) are both very potent anchor drugs with a high barrier to resistance. Due to a favourable side-effect profile, a once-daily (QD) formulation and its virological potency, DRV is currently one of the most frequently used PIs in Europe and the USA. In addition, the new, once-daily administrable integrase inhibitor DTG showed an excellent tolerability profile as well as a high resistance barrier.
The nuke-free combination of DTG (50 mg) with the Ritonavir (/r)- or Cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitor DRV (800 mg) may offer a favorable safety and efficacy profile with the advantage of QD-dosing.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥ 18 years
HIV infection with HIV RNA < 50 cps/ml within a period of at least 24 weeks suppressive ART prior to randomization, with one accepted blip of HIV RNA < 200 cps/ml and well-tolerated antiretroviral therapy: consisting of 2 NRTI (ABC/3TC, F/TDF or F/TAF) in combination with DRV/r for a period of at least 28 days prior to randomizsation.
No known genotypic DRV- or integrase inhibitor-related HIV resistance
Signed written informed consent
Documented negative HLA B*57:01 (only in case of Abacavir-containing ART)
A female subject may be eligible to enter and participate in the study if she:
Complete abstinence from penile-vaginal intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of IMP, throughout the study, and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of all study medications
Double barrier method (male condom/spermicide, male condom/diaphragm, diaphragm/spermicide)
Male partner sterilization confirmed prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject
Approved hormonal contraception without DRV/r interactions and a barrier method
Any other method with published data showing that the expected failure rate is <1% per year. Any contraception method must be used consistently, in accordance with the approved product label and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of IMP.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
269 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal