Duraplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (DATSCI)

University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter

Spinal Cord Injury, Acute

Spinal Cord Injury Cervical

Treatments

Procedure: Expansile duraplasty

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Other U.S. Federal agency

Identifiers

NCT07280351

24-42716

CDMRP-SC240090 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does expansile duraplasty work to improve recovery in people with acute traumatic SCI?
How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?

Researchers will compare the strength, movement, and overall recovery of participants who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty to see if the use of expansile duraplasty leads to better recovery for people with acute traumatic SCI.

Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups: an Experimental group and a Control group. Participants in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. Participants in the Control group will not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. All participants will:

Provide samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid
Undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans
Undergo an assessment of the ability to move arms/legs and feel touch or pin prick
Answer questionnaires about medical history, pain, health, and independence with activities of daily living

Full description

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial aimed at evaluating safety and effectiveness of expansile duraplasty in people hospitalized for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Traumatic SCI remains a challenging clinical problem for which treatment options remain limited, despite significant ongoing efforts by industry, non-profit organizations and academia to unveil the mechanisms behind it. There is currently no clearly beneficial pharmaceutical therapy for SCI, so in the absence of suitable pharmacotherapy, early surgical decompression and optimization of spinal cord perfusion have been emerged as targets for intervention. Common surgical techniques do not address intrathecal compression due to spinal cord swelling. The lack of dural decompression after SCI is in contrast to traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is a routine part of decompressive craniectomy. There remains a paucity of data on whether durotomy or expansile duraplasty may provide additional benefit in decompressing the injured spinal cord, though preclinical animal data has for decades been in favor of early decompression, and there is evidence from non-randomized human studies that suggest duraplasty may lead to improved outcomes for SCI patients. These data, along with other published SCI research, served as motivation to explore expansile duraplasty in humans.

Specific objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to evaluate (i) effectiveness of the expansile duraplasty in improving neurologic motor outcomes in patients with acute traumatic SCI; (ii) safety of expansile duraplasty in acute traumatic SCI patients; (iii) exploratory effectiveness of reducing intrathecal pressure (ITP) by expansile duraplasty in patients with acute traumatic SCI.

Eligible patients admitted at participating sites will be approached for study participation prior to their standard of care (SOC) index surgery for acute traumatic SCI. Consenting participants will be randomized into either the Experimental or Control group, and those in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their SOC surgery. A blood sample, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, motorsensory assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained pre-operatively. Additional CSF samples, motorsensory assessments, and MRI scan will be obtained post-operatively during participants' subsequent stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and acute care units. During this stay, participants will receive standard of care medical treatment for SCI that is standardized across all sites (except where specified), including: close monitoring, including hemodynamic and pressure monitoring; intrathecal pressure measurement, at least once hourly for five days; maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) at 65 and above, via vasopressor administration as needed, for at least five days; post-treatment rehabilitation and occupational therapy procedures, per standard of care at the investigational site. During this time also, the participants will be monitored for Adverse Events (AEs). Questionnaires will be administered and clinical information such as injury characteristics, vitals measurements, and lab results will be collected during the participants' hospital stay.

Study follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months post-injury, with the primary endpoint at the 6-month follow-up. At the follow-up visits, vitals will be measured, a motorsensory assessment completed, and questionnaires on pain and quality of life will be administered. The Investigator will assess participants at each study visit for the occurrence of AEs.

Enrollment

66 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

In initial hospitalization for recent (less than 24 hours) acute, traumatic spinal cord injury at a participating site
Diagnosis of acute, traumatic spinal cord injury
AIS grade A - C
C3 - C7 neurological level of injury on ISNCSCI exam
Imaging showing cord compression
Surgical decompression initiated within 24 hours after injury
At sites where lumbar drain placement is standard of care: placement of lumbar drain
Able to cooperate in the completion of standardized neurological examinations

Exclusion criteria

Injury arising from penetrating mechanism
Pregnancy
In custody
Under psychiatric hold
Presence of traumatic durotomy severe enough to preclude study treatment or procedures, in the opinion of the treating surgeon
Extensive polytrauma as determined by ISS score of >25
History of prior spinal cord injury
Concomitant non-traumatic spinal cord injury (e.g. infection or tumor)
Significant concomitant head injury as defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <14 or a clinically significant abnormality on a head CT (head CT required only for patients suspected to have a brain injury at the discretion of the investigator)
GCS Motor score < 6
Pre-existing neurologic or mental disorder which would preclude accurate evaluation and follow-up (i.e. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, unstable psychiatric disorder with hallucinations and/or delusions or schizophrenia)
The treating surgeon deems that an anterior-only approach to decompression and/or stabilization (e.g. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) is the best treatment plan based on the patient's injury pattern
Recent history (less than 1 year) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance that may impact the outcome or study participation, in the opinion of the investigator
Active malignancy or history of invasive malignancy within the last five years, with the exception of superficial basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated. Patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated definitely more than 1 year prior to enrollment may enter the study.
Thrombocytopenia, defined as less than 100,000 platelets per microliter of blood, that is not correctible by transfusion
Coagulopathy, defined as INR > 1.4, that is not correctible by transfusion
Allergy to the study material, which may include fetal bovine tissue and collagen.
Contraindications for study treatment or procedures
Unable to give informed consent prior to their standard of care surgery