ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Early Elimination of Premature Ventricular Contractions in Heart Failure (EVAC-HF)

University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB) logo

University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB)

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Premature Ventricular Contractions
Congestive Heart Failure

Treatments

Device: PVC ablation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT01757067
HP-00053625

Details and patient eligibility

About

Premature ventricular contractions (PVC) are a very common irregular heart beat (arrhythmias) even in patients without heart disease. Frequent PVCs are thought to occur in about 1-4% of the general population. Many patients with PVCs complain about skipping of their heart (palpitations), shortness of breath and feeling tired. In some patients PVCs may also result in weakening of the heart muscle (heart failure), which might be reversible with suppression of the PVCs.

Full description

A common way to get rid of PVCs is an ablation procedure during which a small area of heart muscle that creates the PVCs is cauterized, so that it can no longer cause PVCs. This has been performed for many years and is an overall safe and effective procedure to eliminate PVCs. In the ablation, a catheter with an electrode at its tip is guided with moving X-rays (fluoroscopy) displayed on a video screen to the exact site inside the heart where cells give off the electrical signals that stimulate the abnormal heart rhythm. Radiofrequency energy (similar to microwave heat) is transmitted from the catheter tip to the area. This destroys carefully selected heart muscle cells in a very small area (about 1/5 of an inch) and can stop the area from creating the extra impulses that cause the extra heartbeats. Additionally, some medications have the ability to suppress PVCs (antiarrhythmic medications). PVC ablation and antiarrhythmic medications have both been used to treat patients with PVC's and a reduced heart function. The heart function is referred to as ejection fraction (measured by cardiac ultrasound (echocardiogram). In this study it will be required the ejection fraction will be less than less than or equal to 45% (with 55% or more being normal).

If enrolled in the study there is a 50/50 chance (like a coin toss and referred to as randomization) that the patient will either continue on the best currently available medical treatment for a weak heart muscle (as determined by the doctor) or will undergo a PVC catheter ablation (with a possible second ablation or antiarrhythmic medication, if the first ablation was not a success).

All patients in the study will continue to take the best possible medications for the heart muscle weakness. If the patient is randomized to not undergo the ablation they will be monitored and at the end of 6 months of participation may choose to have the PVC ablation. If a deterioration may occur patients in the control group can have an ablation earlier.

Enrollment

3 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤45%) demonstrated by transthoracic echocardiogram and deemed to be non-ischemic by nuclear stress test or cardiac catheterization.
  • Patients with >20% PVCs on 24 hour holter-recording
  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Optimized medical therapy on stable therapy for minimum 3 months with no changes in beta-blocker, ACE-I/ARB, digoxin doses (varying diuretic doses permitted).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are under the age of 18 years of age
  • Patients with >2 dominant PVC morphologies
  • Patients with cardiac surgery in previous 3 months or scheduled for following 6 months
  • Patients who were implanted with a biventricular device during the last three months or single/dual chamber device (with ventricular pacing >10%) during the last three months
  • Significant symptoms associated with PVCs that would make favor immediate ablation
  • Intracardiac mural thrombus or myxoma
  • Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

3 participants in 2 patient groups

ablation procedure vs medical therapy
Active Comparator group
Description:
PVC ablation vs medical therapy
Treatment:
Device: PVC ablation
Compare 2 arms for safety, symptoms
No Intervention group
Description:
Compare control of PVC's between 2 groups.

Trial documents
3

Trial contacts and locations

8

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems