ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

ECG Optimization of CRT: Evaluation of Mid-term Response (BEST)

H

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Heart Failure

Treatments

Other: Device programming: nominal
Other: Programming optimization by QRS

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

New simpler methods to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are being evaluated, such as the use of the electrocardiogram.

In this prospective, double-blind, study, the investigators will evaluate:

Primary endpoint: To compare the clinical response to CRT in patients with the programming optimized by QRS versus the nominal suggested by the device.

Secondary endpoints:

  1. To compare cardiac remodeling in patients with the programming optimized by QRS versus the nominal suggested by the device.
  2. To evaluate the degree of asynchrony in both groups (nominal versus optimization by QRS) with respect to the intrinsic rhythm.
  3. To evaluate the echocardiographic improvement in left ventricular (LV) filling in both groups.
  4. To evaluate the differences in the optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay with atrial sensing or atrial pacing.

For that, 180 patients with an indication for CRT will be randomized to nominal programming of the device or optimization by the electrocardiogram for a narrower QRS. A clinical and echocardiographic evaluation will be done at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Enrollment

180 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: patients with standard indication of cardiac resynchronization

  • Ejection fraction ≤35%.
  • QRS duration ≥120 ms.
  • New York Heart Association Functional Class 2-4..
  • Left ventricular diameter ≥55 mm.
  • Optimal medical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Cardiopathy with a reversible cause.
  • Prevision of heart transplantation.
  • Atrial fibrillation.
  • Complete AV block.
  • AV delay >250 ms.
  • Right bundle branch block.
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease.
  • Other diseases with < 1 year life expectancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

180 participants in 2 patient groups

Nominal
Active Comparator group
Description:
CRT device is programmed with the nominal values.
Treatment:
Other: Device programming: nominal
Narrow QRS
Experimental group
Description:
CRT device is programmed by QRS optimization
Treatment:
Other: Programming optimization by QRS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems