Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder which can significantly affect a patient's quality of life and cause strokes. Abnormal electrical activity from the pulmonary veins are thought to be the most common cause of this condition. Current ablative strategy in drug refractory AF is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), where the pulmonary veins are electrically isolated from the body of the left atrium. However, success rate of this procedure remain ~50-70% for a single procedure despite advances in mapping and ablation techniques.
Ganglionated plexuses (GP) are dense clusters of nerves in the atria that are implicated in AF. Endocardial high frequency stimulation (HFS) delivered within the local atrial refractory period can trigger ectopy and AF from specific GP sites (ET-GP). The aim of this study was to understand the role of ET-GP ablation in the treatment of AF by comparing two different strategies:
Full description
This is a prospective, multi-centre study recruiting patients with paroxysmal AF indicated for AF ablation.
180 patients will be recruited. Patients are randomised to either GP ablation alone or to PVI. All antiarrhythmics are stopped for at least 48 hours prior to their procedures.
All have general anaesthesia and CARTO system (Biosense Webster, inc.) are used for 3D electroanatomical mapping of the left atrium.
Patients randomised to GP ablation will have high frequency mapping performed within the atrial refractory period to identify ectopy or AF triggering GP (ET-GP) sites in the left atrium. Patients in this group will only have GP ablation and will not have pulmonary veins isolated.
The primary endpoint is any documented atrial arrhythmia 30 seconds or more after a 3 month blanking period. This will be assessed for up to 12 months post-procedure, using 48hr Holter monitors at 3, 6, 9 and 12 month intervals.
Secondary endpoints include mortality, major complications and redo procedures.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
116 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal