Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
A committee will judge the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban and the regular treatment (standard of care).
All children in the study will receive free treatment. They will have a 2 in 3 chance to receive edoxaban, and a 1 in 3 chance to receive the standard of care for preventing blood clots.
The study will find out if edoxaban is safer and more effective than the standard of care.
Full description
The primary objective is to compare the safety of edoxaban with the standard of care (SOC) in pediatric subjects with cardiac diseases at risk of thromboembolic complications who need primary or secondary anticoagulant prophylaxis with regard to the combination of major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding per International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH] definition.
The key secondary objective is to compare the efficacy of edoxaban against SOC with regard to the development of symptomatic thromboembolic events (TE) in the systemic arterial or venous pathways including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), stroke, intracardiac thrombus and myocardial infarction (MI), and asymptomatic intracardiac thrombus identified by cardiac imaging.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Either one of the following:
a child with cardiac disease who has a history of cardiac shunt occlusion/thrombosis, with shunt still in place (secondary prevention).
OR
a child with cardiac disease who requires (including those already taking, and those not yet taking) anticoagulation for primary prevention of TE.
Cardiac conditions known to significantly increase the risk of thrombosis (hence, indications for primary TE prevention) are defined in Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis. Some examples of cardiac conditions at risk of thrombosis are Fontan surgery, heart failure, Kawasaki disease, and Blalock-Taussig and Glenn surgery.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
168 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal