Education and Exercise for Patients With Longstanding Hip and Groin Pain (HIPSTER)

Lund University

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Groin Injury; Femoro Acetabular Impingement; Hip Pain Chronic

Treatments: Other: Usual care; Other: HIPSTER

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05853640

2022-05023-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

Longstanding hip and groin pain (LHGP) is a common and debilitating problem in young to middle aged individuals. These patients often get referred to orthopedic departments. Consensus statements on the management of these patients commonly recommend a physical therapist-led intervention as the first line intervention. However, the optimal content and delivery of this intervention is currently unknown. In this study we will compare the effectiveness of usual care (unstructured physical therapist-led intervention) to a semi-structured, progressive individualized physical therapist-led intervention on hip-related quality of life in people with longstanding hip and groin pain referred to an orthopedic department.

Full description

This study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial, comparing the effectiveness of patient education and exercise therapy to usual care on hip-related quality of life in people with longstanding hip and groin pain referred to an orthopedic department. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either usual care (orthopedic diagnostic pathway and recommendation of physical therapy) or the HIPSTER model, a semi-structured, progressive and individualized physical therapist-led intervention focusing on patient education and exercise therapy.

The primary aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of a structured physical therapist-led treatment model (HIPSTER) compared to usual care on hip-related quality of life. The primary hypothesis is that the HIPSTER model will be superior to usual care by at least 10 points between group change in improving self-reported hip-related function and quality of life, measured by iHOT-33.

Secondary aims include comparing group differences in achievement of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at 4 months and to compare between group changes in self-reported physical activity, pain self-efficacy, and pain catastrophizing, and physical performance tests regarding ROM, muscle force production, hop performance and balance between the HIPSTER group and usual care (baseline to 4 months), as well as cost-effectiveness of the interventions.

A full trial protocol will be published. The primary analysis will be performed using a t-test, according to intention-to-treat principles. A per protocol analysis will also be conducted, comparing participants who completed usual care or the HIPSTER model with high fidelity. Relevant parametric and non-parametric tests will be performed to compare change in physical performance tests and secondary PROMs.

A subgroup of patients will be included in qualitative study, using a semi-structured interview to capture the experience of participating in the HIPSTER intervention. Another subgroup will perform more advanced biomechanical analysis, including 3d-motion analysis.

Enrollment: 122 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 55 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Men and women aged 18-55 years
• Referred to the Dept of Orthopedics due to hip and/or groin pain
• Activity-related unilateral or bilateral groin pain >3 months
• Pain reproduced with the FADIR test.

Exclusion criteria

• Groin pain originating from any diagnosis with other treatment pathways, i.e., i) Acute traumatic hip injuries (such as hip dislocation, hip fractures); ii) Verified moderate or severe OA (Tönnis grade >1); iii) Palpable hernia; iv) Low-back pain with a positive straight leg raise test and/or hip and groin pain provoked primarily by repeated motions of the lumbar spine; v) Sacroiliac joint pain with thigh thrust test.
• Co-morbidities potentially interfering with treatment, i.e., i) Co-morbidities overriding the hip and groin-related symptoms and dysfunction (such as other acute lower limb injuries, rheumatoid arthritis etc), ii) Co-morbidities prohibiting physical activity and training (heart disease etc), iii) Current psycho-social disorders requiring treatment.
• Other: i) History of drug abuse within the last year; ii) Not understanding the language of interest (Scandinavian languages, or English).

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

122 participants in 2 patient groups

Usual care

Active Comparator group

Description:

Participants in this group will undergo usual care at the orthopedic department and will get a recommendation for physical therapist-led treatment in primary care.

Treatment:

Other: Usual care

HIPSTER

Experimental group

Description:

Participants in this group will undergo usual care at the orthopedic department and will also receive a semi-structured intervention according to the HIPSTER treatment model.

Treatment:

Other: HIPSTER