ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of 3D-printed Reconstruction System in Size of Left DLT

U

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Lung Isolation
Cancer of Lung

Treatments

Other: traditional method for selecting double lumen tube
Other: 3D reconstruction

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06258954
scchec-20240128

Details and patient eligibility

About

The precise and accurate size of DLT is a prerequisite to ensure its accurate position of its placement. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology can accurately reproduce the tracheobronchial structure to improve the correct size selection of DLT. To make it simpler, the investigators developed an automatic comparison software for 3D reconstruction based on computed tomography data (3DRACS). In this study, the investigators aimed to prove that 3DRACS is much more efficient in endobronchial intubation compared to the traditional method.

Full description

Lung isolation techniques are commonly used to facilitate surgical exposure and to provide single-lung ventilation for patients undergoing various intra-thoracic procedures. Lung isolation is primarily accomplished with a double-lumen tube (DLT) or bronchial blocker. One published study showed that residents with limited experience had a 40% error rate in accurately placing a DLT. The accurate choice of the size of DLT is a prerequisite for good lung isolation.Currently, There is lack of proper objective criteria for selecting size of DLT. DLT size selection is estimated empirically using the patient's height and sex, and studies have shown that the size of DLT according CT images of the chest is more accurate than experience. The investigators have developed an automatic comparison software for 3D reconstruction based on CT data (3DRACS). It reconstructs the trachea and bronchus and compares them with the DLT, predicting the most suitable size of the DLT for lung isolation. The aim of this study was to compare whether the use of 3DRACS to select a DLT size compared to conventional empirical selection methods could improve incidence of DLT intubation success and reduce airway injury.

Enrollment

200 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged between 18 and 75 years.
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I-III.
  3. Planned to receive lung resection surgery during lung isolation techniques by using DLT.
  4. Signed informed written consent.

Exclusion criteria

The participant experiences any of the following:

  1. Spinal malformation,
  2. Expected difficult airway
  3. Tracheal stenosis
  4. Tracheal tumor
  5. Bronchial tumor
  6. Distorted airway anatomy
  7. Tumors of the mouth or neck

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

200 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

3D group
Experimental group
Description:
Using automatic comparison software for 3D reconstruction to determine the size of DLT.
Treatment:
Other: 3D reconstruction
control group
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
The size of DLT is based on patient's sex and height.
Treatment:
Other: traditional method for selecting double lumen tube

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Xin Wang, master

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems