Effect of a Maintenance Protocol After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Status

Completed

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Treatments

Procedure: Glycine air powder

Procedure: Rubber cup polishing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05574218

EMS/MTO

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a supportive treatment protocol (SPIT). Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Full description

Study design:

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, RCT to evaluate the efficacy of a SPIC protocol. Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Interventions:

At the 6-month evaluation after the surgery, the baseline data for the present study were obtained and patients were randomised using a computerized block randomization protocol to one of the following SPIC protocols. In the test group, implant surfaces were treated with glycine powder air-polishing after ultrasonic instrumentation; the specific nozzle was activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant for 1 minute. In the control group, implants were cleaned with a rubber cup and polishing paste after ultrasonic instrumentation. This SPIC visits were carried out at 6 (baseline visit), 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after surgery.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Presence of at least one implant with peri-implantitis, defined as: radiographic evidence of bone loss >2 mm, inflammation of the peri-implant mucosa as defined by positive BoP and/or suppuration, and at least one site with PD ≥ 5 mm.
Based on the radiographic examination, the affected implant should not have a vertical peri-implant defect. Positive selection was based on the presence of pe-ri-implant lesions wider than 4 mm, with an angle greater than 35 º.
In patients with a history of periodontitis, periodontal therapy should have been provided at least 6 months prior to the initiation of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Presence of relevant medical conditions and/or systemic medications that would contraindicate the surgical procedure or modify the tissue response after therapy.
Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
Heavy smokers (> 10 cigarettes/day).
Pregnant or lactating women