Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether two types of breathing training can improve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults.
The main research questions are:
Researchers will compare VIS training, DBE training, and usual care to determine whether breathing training can serve as a safe and effective non-pharmacological treatment option for GERD.
Participants will:
Full description
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder resulting from dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and impaired anti-reflux barrier mechanisms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in reducing gastric acid secretion, up to 30-40% of patients report persistent symptoms despite optimized medical therapy. Non-pharmacological interventions are therefore of growing clinical interest.
Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (DBE) targets abdominal breathing patterns to enhance diaphragmatic tone and coordination. This may improve the esophagogastric junction competence and reduce transient LES relaxations. Volume-oriented incentive spirometry (VIS), a device providing visual feedback during sustained deep inspiration, has been demonstrated to facilitate diaphragmatic recruitment and strengthen inspiratory effort. VIS has shown benefits in perioperative recovery, pulmonary rehabilitation, and post-COVID-19 recovery, but has not yet been systematically studied in GERD populations.
This randomized controlled trial adopts a parallel three-arm design, comparing VIS training, DBE training, and a usual care control group. Participants in the intervention arms will be instructed to perform their assigned breathing training twice daily for six weeks. Standardized protocols will be applied: VIS training will target 80-90% of predicted inspiratory capacity with 3-5 seconds of breath-hold at peak inspiration, while DBE will emphasize abdominal expansion and controlled diaphragmatic contraction.
Objective outcome measures include high-resolution manometry (HRM) to assess LES basal pressure and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring to quantify esophageal acid exposure time (AET) and reflux episodes. GERD symptom severity will be evaluated using validated questionnaires (GERDQ). Assessments are scheduled at baseline and week 7 following the intervention.
The primary hypothesis is that both VIS and DBE will improve GERD symptoms compared with usual care, with VIS expected to demonstrate superior enhancement of diaphragmatic activation and LES pressure. Secondary outcomes will explore physiological changes in esophageal acid exposure, symptom-reflux association, and intervention feasibility.
This trial is expected to generate evidence supporting safe, low-cost, and accessible non-pharmacological strategies for GERD management, complementing or potentially reducing the need for long-term pharmacotherapy.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
51 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Kun Ching Chou, MD; Shu-Ju Tu, MSN, NP, RN
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal