Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This will be a double-blind crossover trial in 20 patient with stable COPD. Data from this study will provide proof-of-concept information on whether the (anticipated) additional bronchodilator effect of Brovana added to tiotropium will lead to a meaningful improvement in the patient-centered outcome, exercise capacity. This study will only evaluate the effects of short-term (1-week) administration of Brovana. If results are positive, it would provide preliminary data for further, multicenter investigations.
Full description
Hypotheses to be tested:
Brovana nebulized twice daily added to maintenance inhaled tiotropium therapy in stable COPD patients increases:
Patients: Twenty patients will be studied
Location: Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Excluded drugs:
Allowed drugs:
Removal of patients from study:
COPD exacerbations during study:
If the patient experiences a COPD exacerbation during the study which requires a change in medication or an addition of medication (such as oral steroids or antibiotics) the study will be held until stability is reached. At that time, the study will resume, beginning with new, 1-week treatment /testing corresponding to the study sequence when the exacerbation began. If the patient does not resume stability within four weeks or has a second exacerbation, the study will be terminated.
Study design: This will be a double-blind, crossover, single-site study in COPD patients who are in stable condition. All patients in study randomized to test drug by Visit 2 will have been on steady-state tiotropium therapy, off commercial long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), and using prn short-acting beta-agonists (SABA). Only acute (i.e., 1-week) effects of Brovana will be studied. SABA will be withheld from midnight before testing on each day.
Exercise testing and inspiratory capacity (IC) measurements Incremental and steady-state endurance testing will be performed on a treadmill in the Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. The incremental test (Visit 1) will be performed to a symptom-limited maximum, with a goal to have the test duration over approximately 10 minutes. The protocol used for this will be from Porszasz et al using simultaneous increases in treadmill speed and incline, with settings based on estimated maximal workrate. Warm-up will be 1 mph at 1% grade. This will be followed at 30-second intervals by increases in speed and incline. Patients will have breath by breath measurements of expired air using our Sensormedics equipment, via a mouthpiece. IC measurements will also be measured at rest and at every minute into exercise.
Endurance tests (Visit 2, 4, 5) will be at 75% of the maximal rate determined from the initial test. For exercise capacity, duration in exercise time will be the primary outcome variable. IC will be measured at rest and at every minute during exercise.
An ECG will be performed before each exercise test, and continuous pulse oximetry will be monitored. A physician will be in attendance at each test.
Primary Efficacy Variables:
Change in FEV1 near peak effect (~ 2 hours of AM laboratory dosing of tiotropium plus test drug):
Change in treadmill endurance time at ~75% of maximum (Δ endurance time) Brovana versus placebo: from baseline testing on tiotropium alone compared to testing on tiotropium + study drug.
Change in static (resting), iso-time, and peak exercise IC measurements, which will be used as our estimates of hyperinflation; Brovana versus placebo: from baseline testing on tiotropium alone compared to testing on tiotropium + study drug.
a. The primary co-comparisons will be: i. Δ IC at rest (static hyperinflation) (@ 2 ¼ hours after Tiotropium + Brovana compared to tiotropium alone ii. Δ IC at iso-time (static hyperinflation) (@ 2 ¼ hours after Tiotropium + Brovana compared to tiotropium alone. We are not sure what iso-time we will use, but if all patients go six minutes into exercise, we will use the six minute mark.
b. The analyses will be performed using a repeated-measures design, PROC GLM Repeated, SAS
Sample Size Estimation The van Noord sited earlier powered their study assuming a ~ 140 mL standard deviation for paired differences in FEV1 (determined from earlier trials), a difference of ~ 50 mL, and a power of 0.90. They achieved a 150 mL (0.150 L) difference in FEV1. For our study, using a difference of 150 mL, a standard deviation of 140 mL, and a power of 0.80, 16 patients would be sufficient.
In a study by O'Donnell et al the combination of fluticasone 250 mcg / salmeterol 50 mcg was compared to salmeterol alone and placebo. Outcome variables included spirometry, lung volumes and exercise endurance time at 75% of maximal on a cycle ergometer. The average improvement (compared to placebo) in FEV1 at Day 1 (taken from graph) was about 200 mL with both the combination and salmeterol. The treatment-difference improvement in exercise endurance time with the combination was 131 ± 31 seconds (p. < 0.004), representing a 22% improvement. For salmeterol alone it was 49 ± 37 seconds. Our study would use a treadmill rather than a cycle ergometer; this will probably lead to more dyspnea-limitation than leg fatigue limitation. We predict the Δ FEV1 at two hours post dosing (compared to tiotropium alone) with Brovana + tiotropium in our study will ~ 150 mL - a Δ not too dissimilar to the O'Donnell study Δ. To detect a 90 second difference in endurance time (1/2 way between 131 seconds and 49 seconds), and assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 35 seconds, our study would be amply powered.
Study Sequence
Visit 1:
Visit 2: 1 day (for patients already on tiotropium) to 1 week (those starting tiotropium) after Visit 1:
Visit 3: 1 week after Visit 2, after maintenance tiotropium
Visit 4: 1 weeks after Visit 3, after test drug # 1
Visit 5: 1 week after Visit 4, after washout
Visit 6: 1 week after Visit 5, after test drug # 2
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal