ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Cryotherapy Modalities on Skin Temperature, Radial Artery Size and Flow Where Arterial Puncture Are Performed (ECCRIOGAS)

J

Julio Alberto Mateos Arroyo

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Radial Artery Size
Temperature
Blood Flow Velocity

Treatments

Device: Crushed ice
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Room temperature gel

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05915234
ECCRIOGAS

Details and patient eligibility

About

Low-intervention clinical trial. The thermal and hemodynamic effects of different cryotherapy devices are evaluated. This study is included in the doctoral thesis of the principal investigator.

Investigators:

Principal Investigator: Julio Alberto Mateos Arroyo (RN, MSc, PhD student) Directors: Ignacio Zaragoza García (RN, PhD), Ismael Ortuño Soriano (RN, PhD), Paloma Posada Moreno (PhD).

Setting: Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

The three interventions to be evaluated are:

  • Applying crushed ice.
  • Apply frozen peas.
  • Apply comparator.

Hypothesis: There are differences in the reduction of temperature, dimensions of the internal lumen of the radial artery and blood flow inside it depending on the different modalities of cryotherapy (crushed ice or bag of frozen peas) applied in the anatomical area of the wrist, point of arterial puncture for blood gas analysis.

Main objective: To analyze the effect of 3 cryotherapy devices on the radial artery area.

Secondary objectives

  • To analyze the thermal behavior of the superficial tissue under study according to the cryotherapy device used.
  • To analyze the differences in the radial artery caliber before and after the application of cold in the different experimental modalities under study.
  • To analyze the differences in radial artery blood flow before and after the application of cold in the different experimental modalities under study.
  • To identify the safety pattern of the use of the different cryotherapy devices (adverse events).

Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. This is a crossover clinical trial in which all participants will receive all interventions and will be randomized in the order in which they receive them.

Population: Adults with a good general state of health, who specifically do not have factors that could affect their thermoregulation or vascular pathologies.

Main variables:

  • Skin surface temperature.
  • Radial artery size.
  • Radial artery blood flow.

Full description

Pain caused by arterial puncture for blood gas analysis is one of the most common problems with this procedure. The low utilization rates of effective methods by healthcare providers for pain reduction, such as subcutaneous infiltration of anesthetics, make it necessary to search for effective and simple methods. The use of cryotherapy devices has proven effective for this purpose because the decrease in temperature increases pain threshold and tolerance due to a reduction in nerve conduction velocity and inhibition of nociceptors. In order to standardize these devices, it is necessary to understand the specific thermodynamic and hemodynamic effects of these devices. At the hemodynamic level, the reduction in temperature can produce arterial vasoconstriction. This effect may decrease the palpation of the radial artery, a necessary step for the identification of the optimal point of arterial puncture. Our hypothesis is that there are differences in temperature reduction, radial artery internal lumen dimensions and blood flow inside the radial artery depending on the different cryotherapy modalities applied in the anatomical area of the wrist, the point of arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. In order to obtain an answer to this hypothesis, we will propose a randomized controlled clinical trial with a sham comparator and two active interventions: crushed ice and frozen peas. In addition, this trial has a crossover design with the aim of minimizing the differences that may arise due to individual particularities (within-group variability), and thus increase the possible effect of the interventions (between-group variability). This choice has its justification in that the application of cryotherapy, according to some studies, has a thermal reducing effect with high individual variability. In this study, adults with a good general state of health, who specifically do not have factors that could affect their thermoregulation or vascular pathologies, will be recruited.

Enrollment

48 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Good general health.
  • Conscientious, with full cognitive and communicative capacity.
  • Signed informed consent for this randomized clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

  • Active smoker.
  • Cardiovascular disease.
  • Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Cyanosis of hands and fingers, Raynaud's Syndrome, Scleroderma and/or CREST Syndrome.
  • Diabetes.
  • Surgery, recent wounds or any type of major injury affecting the neck, shoulder girdle, upper limbs and/or hands.
  • Carrier of an arterio-venous fistula.
  • Lack of sensitivity to cold.
  • Alcohol or caffeine intake in the last 24 hours.
  • Intense physical exercise in the last 24 hours.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

48 participants in 6 patient groups

Order number 1: Ice-Peas-Control
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: crushed ice - frozen peas - control.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice
Order number 2: Ice-Control-Peas
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: crushed ice - control - frozen peas.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice
Order number 3: Peas-Ice-Control
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: frozen peas - crushed ice - control.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice
Order number 4: Peas-Control-Ice
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: frozen peas - control - crushed ice.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice
Order number 5: Control-Ice-Peas
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: control - crushed ice - frozen peas.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice
Order number 6: Control-Peas-Ice
Experimental group
Description:
Each subject will receive all interventions and the control and they will randomly assigned to a sequence order. In this arm the sequence order is: control - frozen peas - crushed ice.
Treatment:
Device: Room temperature gel
Device: Frozen peas
Device: Crushed ice

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Julio Alberto Mateos Arroyo, RN, MSc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems