ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Diaphragm Stimulation During Surgery

University of Florida logo

University of Florida

Status

Completed

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation Complication
Diaphragm Injury

Treatments

Other: Electrical stimulation of hemidiaphragm

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT03303040
R01AR072328 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
IRB201602186-N

Details and patient eligibility

About

During major surgical procedures general anesthesia is used to make the patient unconscious. General anesthesia insures that the patient is unaware of any pain caused by surgery. General anesthesia also prevents the patient from moving to prevent any potential surgical error. At the same time general anesthesia makes it impossible for the patient to breathe. To help the patient breathe a breathing tube is placed into the patient's airway and connected to the mechanical ventilator. A mechanical ventilator is an artificial breathing pump, which delivers gas into a patient's airways.

The purpose of this research study is to determine if brief periods of diaphragm stimulation can prevent diaphragm problems caused by the use of mechanical ventilators and surgery. To answer this question the changes in the genes responsible for maintaining diaphragm function will be studied. A gene is the code present in each cell in your body and controls the behavior of that cell. In addition, the changes in the contractile properties of muscle fibers will be studied. The results from this study may help develop new treatments to prevent diaphragm weakness resulting from mechanical ventilation use.

Full description

Although mechanical ventilation (MV) is life-sustaining, it comes with a cost. MV dramatically reduces diaphragm contractility, induces ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) and sometimes leads to weaning failure. VIDD includes reduced mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress, muscle fiber damage and decreased diaphragm force production.

In animal models, intermittent diaphragm contraction during MV support attenuates VIDD. However, there are only limited data addressing this problem in humans. Here, the study team propose to directly test the hypothesis that intermittent electrical stimulation (ES) of the human hemidiaphragm during prolonged cardiac surgeries with MV support prevents/attenuates VIDD in the active hemidiaphragm. Mitochondrial function is central to energy metabolism and skeletal muscle function in a chronically active muscle, such as the diaphragm. Although abnormal mitochondrial function is thought to precipitate VIDD in animal models, limited data are available concerning mitochondrial contributions to VIDD in humans. Of even greater importance, there are no interventions available to attenuate these defects in humans. Here, the study team will test the impact of an innovative experimental treatment, intermittent electrical stimulation (ES) of the hemidiaphragm during prolonged surgeries with MV, on mitochondrial function, single fiber contractile properties and catabolic muscle pathways in human diaphragm. Using a within-subjects experimental design, muscle samples from a stimulated hemidiaphragms will be compared with samples from the unstimulated hemidiaphragm. The study team will investigate mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress during prolonged CTS/MV, and the potential of ES to attenuate or prevent VIDD. Next, the study team will investigate the effects of ES on single fiber contractile properties and Titin integrity. Finally, the study team will study the effect of ES on proteolytic pathways (caspase, calpain and ubiquitin-proteasome) and ribosomal RNA markers of decreased protein synthesis implicated in VIDD.

Enrollment

25 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing complex, elective prolonged surgeries, usually lasting 5-8 hours or longer, including lung transplants (e.g. valveoplasty, coronary artery bypass and/or aortic repairs)

Exclusion criteria

  • history of prior surgery to the diaphragm or pleura;
  • a diagnosis of COPD will be determined from a clinical history consistent with chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema, a long history of cigarette smoking, and pulmonary function tests consistent with irreversible airflow obstruction (FEV1 < 40% predicted, according to European Respiratory Society criteria [will not apply to transplant patients]
  • a diagnosis of chronic heart failure (NYHA class IV)
  • clinical diagnosis of other lung disease (cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, lung cancer; etc.) [will not apply to transplant patients]
  • renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 1.6 mg/dl);
  • severe hepatic disease (any liver function tests > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal);
  • undernourishment (body mass index < 20 kg/m2),
  • chronic uncontrolled or poorly controlled metabolic diseases (e.g., diabetes, hypo- or hyperthyroidism)
  • orthopedic diseases, suspected paraneoplastic or myopathic syndromes,
  • if in the surgeons' judgment the patients' clinical status warrants, diaphragm stimulation will be stopped and biopsies will not be obtained,

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

25 participants in 2 patient groups

Stimulation
Experimental group
Description:
Electrical stimulation of hemidiaphragm
Treatment:
Other: Electrical stimulation of hemidiaphragm
Control
No Intervention group
Description:
No stimulation of hemidiaphragm

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems