ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Different Strategies for Titrating a High MAP on Microcirculation

S

Southeast University, China

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Hypertension
Septic Shock

Treatments

Drug: Crystalloid
Drug: Norepinephrine

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02085291
Targeting microcirculation (Other Identifier)
2014ZDll.2

Details and patient eligibility

About

Assess the effect of fluids and norepinephrine for mean arterial pressure titration to patients' usual level on the microcirculation of initial resuscitated hypertensive septic shock patients.

Full description

Microcirculatory dysfunction plays an important role in the development of organ failure in patients with septic shock. Numerous studies focus on the effect of mean arterial pressure (MAP) titration on microcirculation, however, by what strategy is better for microcirculation in septic shock patients with previous hypertension is still a matter of debate. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of different strategies for MAP titration to individualized level on microcirculation in hypertensive septic shock patients.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 100 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Hypertensive patients with septic shock for less than 24 hours. Septic shock was defined by the 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.
  2. Initial fluid resuscitation was performed to maintain the central venous pressure (CVP) for more than 8 mm Hg and central venous hemoglobin saturation for more than 70%.
  3. Patients were still requiring NE to maintain the MAP of 65 mm Hg.

Exclusion criteria

  1. had severe untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure more than 180 mm Hg or/and diastolic blood pressure more than 110 mm Hg);
  2. were younger than 18 years old or pregnant;
  3. were unable to acquire the usual level or resting level of blood pressure;
  4. refused to participate the trial.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

24 participants in 3 patient groups

Resp-FL
Experimental group
Description:
Patients received 500 ml crystalloid for fluid challenge within 20 minutes, then a PLR test was performed to predict fluid responsiveness. If the patient was fluid responsive, more 500 ml crystalloids were given until fluid nonresponsive. If the MAP still not achieved the target value, NE was increased to achieve the target one. The target MAP was maintain MAP within 10% of the reference value.
Treatment:
Drug: Crystalloid
Resp-NE
Experimental group
Description:
In Resp-NE group, norepinephrine was increased to enhance MAP within 10% of the reference value.
Treatment:
Drug: Norepinephrine
Nonresp-NE
Experimental group
Description:
In Nonresp-NE group, norepinephrine was increased to enhance MAP within 10% of the reference value.
Treatment:
Drug: Norepinephrine

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems