ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of HSA or Saline Diluent on Immunotherapy Extract Stability as Determined by Graded ID Skin Tests

B

Bryan Martin, DO

Status and phase

Withdrawn
Phase 2
Phase 1

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Treatments

Drug: diluent, saline with HSA--phenol
Drug: saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01989897
2012H0217

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a double-blind study with respect to the diluents used, with patients known to be allergic to the specific allergen tested. Three study sites will be involved, each testing one allergen (Cat, Mite, Timothy grass pollen). Subjects who are known to be allergic to the allergen in question will be tested with serial three-fold dilutions to determine the ID 50 and relative extract potency using the method described by Turkeltaub.

Full description

The specific objective of this study is to determine the stability of immunotherapy extract dilutions. Higher dilutions (lower potency) have been shown in vitro to decrease in potency over time more rapidly than less dilute preparations. The investigators hope to determine whether there is a detectable difference in skin test reaction of dilutions of three common antigens (Cat, Timothy Grass, Dust Mite). The diluents used strongly affect the strength when extract potency is tested in vitro. Therefore, the investigators expect to find a detectable difference in skin test potency based on the diluents used (Saline vs. HSA Saline [300mcg/ml]).

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

    1. Subjects must demonstrate their willingness to participate in the study and comply with its procedures by signing a written informed consent.

    2. Subjects of either gender, ages 18-60 years, with a history of allergic rhinitis related to exposure to the allergen of interest.

    3. Previous positive routine skin test to the allergen to be tested: minimum 5mm wheal diameter with 10,000BAU/mL cat or minimum 5mm wheal diameter with 10,000AU/mL Dermatophagoides farinae or minimum 8mm wheal diameter with timothy 100,000BAU/mL.

    4. AND (in addition to #3) sum of erythema after SPT of at least 50mm or erythema in largest diameter of at least 30mm.

    5. Subject's skin coloring should permit evaluation of erythema. 6. Ability to stop medication that might interfere with the results of the skin prick test.

Exclusion criteria

    1. Spirometry with FEV1 below 80% of predicted normal value and/or poorly controlled asthma 2. Known pregnancy 3. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions. 4. Patients with absolute necessity of antihistamines to control their allergies 5. Patients with active and extensive atopic dermatitis. 6. Patients that take psychotropic medication. 7. General skin hyperreactivity (Negative control greater than 3 mm wheal diameter) or with known tendency for dermatographic urticaria.
  1. Patients currently under allergen immunotherapy treatment or with a history of immunotherapy treatment within the last 5 years to the extract to be tested in this study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

0 participants in 1 patient group

diluents
Experimental group
Description:
Negative control = diluent, saline with HSA--phenol Positive control = saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base
Treatment:
Drug: saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base
Drug: diluent, saline with HSA--phenol

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems