Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion on duodenal peristalsis during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The study compares lidocaine against a placebo to determine if lidocaine can reduce the need for rescue spasmolytics (hyoscine-N-butylbromide or glucagon), decrease propofol consumption, and improve hemodynamic stability.
Full description
Duodenal peristalsis can hinder successful cannulation during ERCP. Traditionally, antispasmodics like hyoscine-N-butylbromide are used but have side effects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes 100 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective ERCP.
Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups:
Group L (Lidocaine): IV bolus 1.0 mg/kg before induction + 2.0 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the procedure.
Group C (Control): Equal volume of 0.9% Saline. Primary outcome is the "Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement" based on endoscopist's evaluation. Secondary outcomes include duodenal peristalsis score (Suzuki Scale) assessed via video review by a blinded endoscopist, total propofol consumption, and recovery times.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
ASA Physical Status I, II, or III.
Age between 18 and 85 years.
Provided written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Severe hepatic or renal failure.
History of AV block or severe cardiac arrhythmia.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Chronic opioid use.
Patient refusal.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mehmet Şahap, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal