Effect of Lidocaine Phonophoresis Versus Pulsed Ultrasound on Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Athletic Children (PH)

Cairo University (CU)

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 1

Conditions: Treatment Side Effects

Treatments: Device: pulsed ultrasound; Other: especially designed physical therapy program; Drug: Lidocaine

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04185194

P.T.REC/012/001708

Details and patient eligibility

About

A topical anesthetic gel lidocaine has been widely used as a local anesthetic to reduce the pain and discomfort. It provides local analgesia by blocking the initiation and transmission of impulses. Lidocaine topical anesthetic gel allows the use of high concentrations of the anesthetic bases without concern about local irritation, uneven absorption or systemic toxicity (Argoff, 2000 ). So, the aim of this study is to compare between the effect of lidocaine phonophoresis and pulsed ultrasound in myofascial pain syndrome in swimmers children.

Full description

Fourty five children (athletic swimmers) participated in this study, and were classified into three groups ; First control group A : this group consisted of fifteen children were receiving traditional physical therapy program. Second study group B: this group consisted of fifteen children were receiving pulsed ultrasound in addition to traditional physical therapy program as the same as in group A. Third study group C: this group consisted of fifteen children were receiving lidocaine phonophoresis in addition to traditional physical therapy program as the same as in group A. Treatment program in the three groups applied three times a week for three successive months. The study was done in the outpatient clinic of Ismailiy Sporting Club, Ismailia, Egypt.

Enrollment: 50 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 10 to 14 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• • Age range from 10 to 14 years.

  • All children have regional neck pain complaint.
  • Tenderness in cervical trigger points in the midpoint of the upper border of trapezius muscle, from grade II to grade IV according to tenderness grading scheme (Hubbard and Berkoff, 1993) (Appendix I ) ● The diagnosis of an active MTrP in the upper trapezius according to (Ardiçet al . , 2002 and Bruno, 2005)

Exclusion criteria

• • Neurological disorders.

  • Dermatological disorders.
  • Acute trauma prior to the study.
  • Fibromyalgia, systemic disease and drug allergy history were excluded from the study.
  • Having myofascial trigger points injection.
  • Chronic pain in both sides of the body.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

50 participants in 3 patient groups

group A

Active Comparator group

Description:

received especially designed physical therapy program

Treatment:

Other: especially designed physical therapy program

group b

Experimental group

Description:

received pulsed ultrasound in addition to physical therapy program

Treatment:

Device: pulsed ultrasound

Other: especially designed physical therapy program

Drug: Lidocaine

group c

Experimental group

Description:

received lidocaine phonophoresis in addition to physical therapy program

Treatment:

Device: pulsed ultrasound

Other: especially designed physical therapy program

Drug: Lidocaine