Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This is a cross-sectional study carried out on 180 Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients who were consecutively recruited from the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic at National Research Center (NRC), Egypt. A face-to-face interview was carried out to collect data about demographic data, medical history, and Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP). Assessment of symptoms, disease severity, and physical disability was carried out using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Quality of life was also assessed using Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL) questionnaire. The studied participants were subjected to clinical examination and anthropometric measurements and a blood sample was collected from them to measure inflammatory biomarkers Interleukin-6 (IL-6). Then a health education and physical exercise were done. An Educational Booklet was designed and distributed to the studied patients. WOMAC, OAKHQOL, and KAP questionnaires were used to assess the effect of health education and lifestyle modification on the participants.
Full description
I) Pre-intervention was done by:
Sociodemographic questionnaire: to gather information regarding participants age, gender, marital status, occupation, level of education, smoking habits, duration of the disease, medical history and medications taken.
Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL) questionnaire: The OAKHQOL is a specific tool to measure QOL in knee and hip OA as it takes into account specific themes that are exclusive to the QOL of patients with knee and hip OA (social support, sleep, side effects of drugs, plans for the future, embarrassment to be seen by people, use of public transport, difficulty in moving after staying in the same position, and sexuality). The concept of this questionnaire was based on the World Health Organization definition of QOL. It is a self-administered questionnaire the original questionnaire was developed in French and later in English, while in the current study, it was translated by the researcher into the Arabic language. It has 43 items which fall into five domains: physical activity (16 items), mental health (13 items), pain (4 items), social support (4 items), social functioning (3 items), and three items are independent. Response to all items is by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10). A total score for each subscale is calculated by averaging the values for items of the same dimension and is normalized to a score from 0 (worst HRQOL) to 100 (best HRQOL). Evaluation of the OAKHQOL has shown the reliability of the five domains to be satisfactory (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.70-0.85), the construct validity to be adequate (Spearman correlation coefficients: 0.43-0.75), and the discrimination to be satisfactory (Rat et al, 2006).
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC): WOMAC is a disease-specific, self-administered health status measure that is widely used to assess the symptoms and physical disability for people with knee and/or hip OA. WOMAC has been translated into more than 65 different languages worldwide, in the current study it was translated by the researcher into the Arabic language, it has been validated for usage via telephone interviews, multimedia with audio-visual presentations, verbally spoken computer programs, and mobile phone applications. It is widely used in OA research especially to monitor the course of the disease or to determine the effectiveness of a variety of interventions (pharmacologic, surgical, physiotherapy etc.). It provides an excellent look at a patient's functional capacity and complements the more objective data provided by magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, cartilage biopsy, and radiographs. It consists of 24 items divided into three subscales:
The Index is available in 5-point Likert (LK), 100mm visual analog (VA), and 11-point numerical rating (NR) scaling formats. On the Likert scale, each question had five alternatives where 0=no constraints or difficulties, 1 = slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= extreme. The highest score for each subscale on WOMAC on the Likert scale was 20 for pain, 8 for stiffness and 68 for physical function. The highest total score (96) denotes worse or more symptoms and the strongest physical constraints.
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) questionnaire: to identify participants' knowledge about OA (what is KOA, symptoms, possible risk factors, complications, how to delay progression, management choices, and side effects), attitude towards non-surgical interventions and practices (nutritional habits, physical activity, treatment, and positions that worsen the condition or protect the knees).
Clinical assessment: the studied participants were subjected to clinical examination and anthropometric measurements (body mass index, waist and hip circumference).
Preintervention assessment of concentration of serum biomarker (IL-6) : A blood sample of 3cm was collected from all the participants after 12- hours fasting (to avoid the inflammatory effect of food) to measure inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6). This assessment was done on a sub sample of participants according to certain circumstances (as not receiving anti-inflammatory drugs in in the past 3 months and those who were adherent to the program of health education).
II) Health Education program Implementation: Nine educational sessions were held. In each session, 10-15 participants attended with total number of 109 participants. The session took 120 minutes.
1.The researcher provided successful aging topics using PowerPoint presentation mainly about 3 key messages:
2.Rheumatologist and physiotherapist also provided messages about the following:
Before getting started with the exercises the participants were asked:
The 1st group of exercises targeted and strengthened the muscles around the knee especially quadriceps muscle:
The 2nd group of exercises worked on stretching the muscles of lower limbs
The 3rd group: The exercises worked on stretching and increasing the range of motion of front and back lower limb muscles (quadriceps muscle, hamstring muscle, gluteus muscle and calf muscles):
During the sessions, all the previous exercises were shown to the participants by a colleague and video recorded as well.
The researcher with the help of the supervisors designed an Educational Booklet after identifying the needs of the studied patients according to baseline health assessment. The booklet included information about osteoarthritis, risk factors, symptoms, diagnostic methods, how to delay its progression, healthy nutrition, importance of weight control and its influences, management of knee OA, physical activities, and home-based exercises with pictures of how to perform it. The booklet was distributed to the participants during the sessions.
3.WhatsApp groups were created for each group of exercises. Through each group, messages were distributed to summarize the content of the booklet. This is an easily accessible way to help them to follow the health education modifications and to keep them motivated to perform the home exercises every day, and to motivate each other. Exercises videos which were taped during the sessions were also sent in the group to remind them how to do each exercise correctly guided with the explanation in the booklet. This group also made it easier to the participants to contact the research team whenever they had any inquiry concerning exercises, lifestyle modifications.
4.Phone calls to follow up the participants and maximize their adherence to the health education program were done.
III) Post-intervention evaluation:
After six months of follow-up, this stage was carried out using WOMAC, OAKHQOL questionnaire, and KAP questionnaire to assess the effect of health education and lifestyle modification on the participants. Additionally, it was done to assess the activity, level of movement] and the degree of pain. Among the 104 participants who attended the health education sessions and finished the home exercise program, only 84 participants were able to fill the post-intervention questionnaires.
In the pre intervention, the mean scores of Il-6 for all participants were within normal (single and total), so there was no benefit of repeating it in the post intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
180 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal