Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating whether changing the width of the surgical tape (mesh) used in transobturator tape (TOT) surgery improves treatment results in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Two mesh widths are being compared: a 1.2 cm mesh (new method) and a 1.0 cm mesh (standard method). The main goal is to find out if the wider mesh leads to better urinary control and fewer complications. Participants will be followed for one year to measure cure rates, symptom improvement, and satisfaction.
Full description
This is a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of mesh width on surgical outcomes in transobturator tape (TOT) procedures for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A total of 106 participants will be randomized using a computer-generated allocation into two groups receiving either a 1.2 cm mesh (intervention group) or a 1.0 cm mesh (standard procedure).
The procedures will be conducted by a single experienced surgeon using a monofilament polypropylene mesh to ensure standardization. Surgical technique, anesthesia protocols, and perioperative management will be identical in both groups.
Primary outcome is objective cure, defined as negative stress test at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include symptom improvement (ICIQ-SF), mesh-related complications (erosion, infection, retention), and patient satisfaction assessed via structured Likert survey.
Follow-up visits are scheduled at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year. Postoperative assessments will be conducted by a blinded evaluator. The study aims to evaluate whether wider mesh width provides superior anatomical support and reduces complication rates in comparison to standard mesh.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
106 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Yusuf Başkıran, Doctor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal