Effect Of PRF Versus Xenograft In Closed Sinus Lift.

Mahmoud adel shaaban

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Implant or Graft; Rejection

Treatments: Other: Prf

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03684954

Cairo Univ.

Details and patient eligibility

About

Indirect sinus lift with used PRF as a graft material versus xenograft

Full description

Crestal incision and reflect the tissue until exposure of the bone, then use drilling to make osteotomy. Then use sutable osteotomes to elevate the sinus floor, then pack of Prf or bone graft in the osteotomy and implant placement . Then closed the flap and suturing.

Enrollment: 10 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25 to 45 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Edentulous area and bone high at least 5-6 mm below the maxillary sinus at maxillary premolar.
• Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

• bad oral hygiene.
• patient with systemic disease that may affect normal healing
• pregnant patients.
• patients with bone diseases and presence of periapical pathology affecting the neighboring teeth.
• Heavy smoker more than 20 cigarettes per day

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

10 participants in 2 patient groups

Used of PRF in clsed sinus lifting

Other group

Description:

Used of PRF in closed sinus lifting with implant placement

Treatment:

Other: Prf

Closed sinus with xenograft

No Intervention group

Description:

used of xenograft in closed sinus lift with implant placement.