Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Evaluate whether the type of probe (plastic vs. metallic) modifies the accuracy of peri-implant probing in single-unit implants, by comparing the probing depth recorded with the prosthesis in place versus without the prosthesis (ΔPD, mm). Secondarily, explore the influence of prosthetic design and implant position on probing values and on other clinical and radiographic parameters.
Full description
Randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups. Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to one of two parallel treatment groups:
Group 1 (Metal probe): Peri-implant probing performed with a UNC-15 metallic periodontal probe (HuFriedy PCPUNC156).
Group 2 (Plastic probe): Peri-implant probing performed with a UNC-15 plastic periodontal probe (HuFriedy PCVO12PT).
Primary objective:
To evaluate whether the type of probe (plastic vs metallic) modifies the accuracy of peri-implant probing in single-unit implants, by comparing the probing depth recorded with the prosthesis in place versus without the prosthesis (ΔPS, mm).
Secondary objectives:
To explore the influence of prosthetic design (e.g., emergence profile, crown contour) and implant position on probing depth values and other clinical/radiographic parameters.
To evaluate patient-reported discomfort during peri-implant probing, recorded using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The study was designed in accordance with the international consensus on Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement (ID-COSM), published in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology in 2023. The protocol includes all applicable mandatory outcome domains recommended by this consensus for implant dentistry clinical trials.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
64 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Octavi Camps Font, DDS MS PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal