Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Primary objective:
Compare recurrence rates of CBD stones in stented versus non-stented patients.
Secondary objectives:
Identify predictors of stone recurrence. Assess the incidence and risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Evaluate time to recurrence and rate of hospital readmissions. Explore impact on quality of life and ease of subsequent cholecystectomy.
Full description
Choledocholithiasis, the presence of stones in the common bile duct (CBD), occurs in 10-20% of patients with symptomatic gallstones and can lead to severe complications such as obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, and pancreatitis Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (**ERCP**) with stone extraction is the gold standard treatment, achieving >90% success rates in ductal clearance.
Despite successful initial clearance, CBD stone recurrence remains a significant issue, with reported rates ranging from 4% to 24% .
To reduce recurrence, prophylactic biliary stenting has been proposed, particularly in high-risk patients (e.g., large or multiple stones, dilated CBD, periampullary diverticulum) However, its routine use remains controversial due to conflicting evidence on efficacy, stent-related complications (e.g., migration, occlusion, cholangitis), and increased healthcare costs.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
"Inclusion Criteria":
"Exclusion Criteria":
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
88 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Huda Mokhtar Huda Mokhtar, Assistant lecturer, master degree
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal