ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation (ERDAF)

H

Hippocration General Hospital

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation
Arterial Hypertension

Treatments

Device: Implantable Loop Recorder
Procedure: Sympathetic Renal Denervation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the ERDAF study (Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation) is to evaluate the renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation(AF) in order to show if there is a reduction in the AF-related symptoms, the AF recurrence rate, and the total burden (symptomatic and/or asymptomatic) of the arrhythmia. To the best of our knowledge, ERDAF is the first randomized study, which is going to evaluate the effect of RDN [without pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)] on AF recurrence profile and AF ''burden'' using continuous long-term rhythm monitoring via ILRs for a period of 18 months.

Hypothesis

Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation reduces AF recurrences, total AF "burden" (asymptomatic / symptomatic) and limits the AF-related symptoms.

Full description

In arterial hypertension (AH), a significant proportion of patients, despite the optimal medical therapy, do not achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) control (resistant hypertension). Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel alternative minimally invasive therapeutic option for patients with resistant AH. Recent data has shown that RDN with or without pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may also have a positive impact on the management of patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no randomized study, to date, suggesting that RDN itself (without PVI) reduces the AF recurrences, symptoms, and the total burden of the arrhythmia. The purpose of this study [Effect of Renal Denervation on Atrial Fibrillation (ERDAF)] is to evaluate the RDN (without PVI) in patients with resistant AH and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF in order to show if there is benefit in the incidence of AF recurrences, the total AF burden (symptomatic and asymptomatic) as well as the BP control. This is a single-center, randomized study in which thirty (30) patients with resistant AH and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF will be randomized (1:1) after sinus rhythm restoration and implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR), in either RDN (n=15) or conventional treatment of resistant AH with optimal drug therapy (n=15). Patients will be followed-up every three months and for a period of 18 months after the implantation of the ILR. The first three months after RDN will be excluded from our final analysis (blanking period). The primary endpoint will be the change in the total AF burden (Total time in AF during the follow-up period). Secondary endpoints will include the change in the symptomatic and asymptomatic burden of AF, the time to detect the first AF recurrence (symptomatic and/or asymptomatic)-early recurrence of AF after RDN, and the change in BP during the follow-up period.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patients >18 years with resistant hypertension [Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg despite treatment with ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs of various classes, including a diuretic) and symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF will be included in the study after sinus rhythm restoration

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with permanent AF or patients with long-standing persistent AF as defined by the current ESC guidelines for the management of AF1.
  2. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] <45 ml / min / 1.73 m2 calculated using the CKD-EPI43.
  3. Patients with secondary arterial hypertension.
  4. Patients with an established diagnosis of resistant hypertension <6 months.
  5. Patients with severe renal artery stenosis or previous renal artery angioplasty.
  6. Patients who have undergone or are about to undergo pulmonary vein isolation.
  7. Patients with left end-diastolic ventricle diameter >60 mm in men or >55mm in women.
  8. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% in the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
  9. Patients with AF possible reversible causes (pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndromes, thyrotoxicosis, alcohol abuse, etc.)
  10. Patients with heart failure in NYHA III-IV stage.
  11. Patients with life expectancy <1 year.
  12. Pregnant women.
  13. Patients who are unable to give consent to participate in the study.
  14. Patients who do not wish to give written consent to participate in the study.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Sympathetic Renal Denervation
Experimental group
Description:
Sympathetic Renal Denervation
Treatment:
Procedure: Sympathetic Renal Denervation
Device: Implantable Loop Recorder
Conventional treatment with drug therapy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Conventional drug therapy of resistant hypertension
Treatment:
Device: Implantable Loop Recorder

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Constantinos P Tsioufis, MD, PhD; Panteleimon E Papakonstantinou, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems