ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Segmental Muscle Vibration on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients

R

Riphah International University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Stroke

Treatments

Device: segmental muscle vibration

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05356481
REC/01390 Shahid Shabbir

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Full description

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and is often associated with persistent involvement of upper limbs.Several disturbances are the manifestation of UL impairments after stroke (i.e., muscle weakness, changes in muscle tone, joint disturbances, impaired motor control) . Muscular weakness and spasticity are most commonly observed in post stroke patients. There are many strategies are developed to improve functional status and to reduce spasticity pattern in post stroke patients. Among the different approaches to improve motor functions in post stroke patients, vibration therapy gives strong stimulatory effects in post paretic limb. Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a fairly new technique that has been used to improve motor function and inhibit spasticity in the hemiplegic upper extremity of patients following a stroke. In SMV, a vibratory stimulus is applied to a specific muscle tendon using a mechanical device unit.The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Enrollment

57 patients

Sex

All

Ages

50 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders
  • Age: between 50-65 years.
  • Spasticity 1-3 on MAS
  • 3-6 months post stroke patients

Exclusion criteria

  • Cardiovascular event (myocardial ischemia or infarction) occurring within 12 months,
  • Use of any antispastic drug
  • Pain from vibration
  • Inflammatory osteoarticular diseases

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

57 participants in 2 patient groups

Experimental Group A
Experimental group
Description:
will recieve (low frequency segmental muscle vibration of 41 Hz over flexors muscles of upper limb Pectoralis minor, Biceps brachii, Flexor carpi muscle + general physical therapy session ) The transducer applied perpendicular to the muscle near its distal tendon insertion.The application consisted of 3 vibration sessions each with duration of 5 minutes for each muscle with 1 minute interval separated these sessions during the interval muscle vibration will interrupted and the subject will request to relax the muscle
Treatment:
Device: segmental muscle vibration
Experimental Group B
Experimental group
Description:
group receive (low frequency segmental muscle vibration of 41 Hz over extensors muscles of upper limb Triceps brachii, Extensor carpi radialis longus \& brevis + general physical therapy session ) The transducer applied perpendicular to the muscle near its distal tendon insertion The application consisted of 3 vibration sessions each with duration of 5 minutes for each muscle with 1 minute interval separated these sessions during the interval muscle vibration will interrupted and the subject will request to relax the muscle
Treatment:
Device: segmental muscle vibration

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Shahid Shabbir, DPT; Imran Amjad, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems