Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this clinical, prospective study involving implants with a superhydrophilic surface is to compare the changes of the peri-implant tissues and the survival rate between diabetics and non-diabetics patients, after 12 months of loading.
hypothesis: It is not expected to find any short-term differences in failures and marginal bone loss between the diabetic and non-diabetic patients. On the longer term higher marginal bone loss may affect the diabetic group 40 patients who are planned to undergo implant installation will be enrolled in the study.
The patients will be divided into 2 groups:
Full description
In recent years, our understanding of the primary processes that affect bone growth around implants has progressed. It was found that the standard surface of most implants is not hydrophilic enough; therefore, it is necessary to increase the healing time to allow sufficient bony apposition at the implant interface, until reaching a satisfactory load-bearing capacity. Studies have demonstrated that surface superhydrophilicity can be gained following storage in an isotonic solution (NaCl); this feature leads to an earlier bone apposition and higher anchorage, already after the very first weeks of implantation.
Hypothesis: It is not expected to find any short-term differences in failures and marginal bone loss between the diabetic and non-diabetic patients. On the longer term higher marginal bone loss may affect the diabetic group.
Aim:to compare the changes of the peri-implant tissues and the survival rate between diabetics and non-diabetics patients, after 12 months of loading.
Methods and Materials: 40 patients who are planned to undergo implant installation will be enrolled in the study, at the department of Periodontology at the School of postgraduate dentistry in the Rambam Health Care Center. .
The patients will be divided into 2 groups:
After insertion of the implants, the following surgical indicators will be taken:
Visit 2 - suture removal (10 ±3days) Visit 3 (surgical uncovering) 12 weeks after implantation (±8 weeks) Visit 4 (follow-up) 16 weeks after implantation (± 8 weeks) :this visit includes periodontal examination (PD, BOP, PI, GI) and GCF sampling.
Visit 5 ( Follow up ) 12 months after rehabilitation (± 4 weeks) :Clinical and radiographic assessment of the periimplant mucosa
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Liron Eliezer; Michal Malka
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal