ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Using Irrigations at Different Temperatures on Postoperative Period During the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Molars

F

Firat University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Treatments

Procedure: saline irrigation at various temperatures (4°C, 25°C)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06020053
FiratUniversitydentistry

Details and patient eligibility

About

An Evaluation of the Effect of Using Irrigations at Different Temperatures on Pain, Edema, and Trismus During the Extraction of Bilateral Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Full description

Abstract Introduction: The surgical extraction of impacted wisdom teeth is a standard practice in dentistry. Unfortunately, inflammatory reactions such as discomfort, edema, and trismus frequently jeopardize patients' well-being after the extraction of third molars. Saline solutions at room temperature (25°C) are routinely used in impacted tooth extraction. Refrigerated serums were used to work with cold serum, and since the refrigerator temperature was 4°C, this study was designed to have a cold serum temperature of 4°C. This study aims to assess the influence of saline irrigation at various temperatures (4°C, 25°C) on postoperative edema, pain, and trismus after the extraction of impacted third molars.

Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with bilateral symmetrical mandibular impacted third molars were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. For each patient, one side was irrigated with a solution at 4°C (test), and the other side was irrigated with a solution at room temperature (25°C) (control). Pain, trismus, and facial edema were noted on the 2nd, 4th, and 7th days. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare pairs, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare groups.

Enrollment

18 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 30 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 to 30 who were classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)1 and who required the removal of impacted third molars on either the right or left side of the mandible;
  • Presence of impacted mandibular third molars on panoramic radiographs, bilaterally symmetrical, with bone retention and bone removal for extraction, position B class 2 of impacted teeth according to the Pell and Gregory Classification System, and mesioangular position according to the Winter Classification;
  • Absence of systemic disease and habitual smoking behavior and absence of an allergy to the drugs to be used postoperatively.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a history of taking antibiotics and analgesics for at least one month;
  • Having an infection in the operation area and acute pericoronitis or severe periodontal disease before the operation;
  • The existence of cysts and tumors within proximity of the impacted third molar.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

18 participants in 2 patient groups

One of the symmetrical Impacted Mandibular Third Molars, control group
No Intervention group
Description:
Serum at room temperature (25°C) was applied to one of the mandibular impacted third molars
One of the symmetrical Impacted Mandibular Third Molars, intervention group
Experimental group
Description:
Serum at temperature (4°C) was applied to one of the mandibular impacted third molars
Treatment:
Procedure: saline irrigation at various temperatures (4°C, 25°C)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems