ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics

P

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

Status and phase

Active, not recruiting
Phase 4

Conditions

Laryngoscopic Stress Response
Video Laryngoscopy
Conventional Laryngoscopy

Treatments

Device: Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy
Device: C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07300878
F.5.2/2024(ERRC)/PIMS

Details and patient eligibility

About

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.

Full description

In this study Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with group V patients being intubated using Videolaryngoscope while group M patients will be intubated using Macintosh laryngoscope. The amount of rise in blood pressure and heart rate as a result of laryngoscopy will be noted.

Enrollment

208 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

16 to 80 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective surgeries under General Endotracheal Anesthesia. ASA class I and II.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy

    • Body mass index >35 kg/m2
    • No teeth
    • Maxillofacial trauma
    • Limited Cervical spine movement
    • Upper Airway Tumors
    • Preoperative assessment indicating difficult airway requiring use of video laryngoscope or fiberoptic intubation.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

208 participants in 2 patient groups

Video laryngoscopy
Experimental group
Description:
Patient in this group will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope
Treatment:
Device: C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy
Conventional Laryngoscopy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopic blade
Treatment:
Device: Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems