ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effect of Video Monitor Size on Adenoma Detection Rate

Mass General Brigham logo

Mass General Brigham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Colon Adenoma

Treatments

Device: Monitor size

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01952418
2013p001462

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rate achieved while using either a 24" video monitor or a 32" video monitor.

Full description

Gastrointestinal endoscopists perfoming routine endoscopic procedures and their patients will be randomized to one of two endoscopy rooms at the MGH Ambulatory Endoscopy Center at Charles River Plaza. The two rooms will have identical equipment with the exception that one room will have the current standard size video monitor (NDS 26") used at this facility while the other room will have a larger video monitor (NDS 32"). The ADR achieved by each physician in each room will be compared.

Enrollment

1,805 patients

Sex

All

Ages

25 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Physician endoscopist performing colonoscopy at Massachusetts General Hospital GI Endoscopy Unit
  • Patients receiving these procedures at Massachusetts General Hospital GI Endoscopy Unit

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

1,805 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard monitor (24")
No Intervention group
Description:
Endoscopists in this arm will perform colonoscopy using the standard size video monitor (24").
Large monitor (32")
Active Comparator group
Description:
Subjects randomized to this group will perform colonoscopy while viewing a large video monitor (32").
Treatment:
Device: Monitor size

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems