Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study investigates the effect of vitamin D on bone loss around mandibular implant overdentures. Bone levels around implants will be measured to understand how vitamin Daffect the health of implant-supported dentures. This information may help improve dental treatment outcomes
Full description
Tooth loss affects patient's quality of life. The use of mandibular implant overdentures is an accepted treatment option that improves prosthesis retention, stability, and masticatory efficiency compared to conventional complete dentures.
Vitamin D plays a critical role in bone metabolism and osseointegration of dental implants. Deficiency may impair bone healing and accelerate peri-implant bone loss.
The purpose of this retrospective study is to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effect of serum vitamin D levels on peri-implant tissues in patients rehabilitated with unsplinted mandibular implant overdentures.
Patient records are screened for serum vitamin D levels, radiographs at baseline of loading and follow-up intervals ( 6 & 12 months after loading )and clinical notes.
Patients categorize into two groups based on their recorded serum vitamin D levels: group A - deficient vitamin D : < 20 ng/mL and group B - sufficient vitamin D: ≥ 30 ng/mL.
All participants rehabilitated with unsplinted, three-implant mandibular overdentures assisted by LOCATOR attachments. Minor variations in implant dimensions and positioning are accepted, provided the implants were placed in the midline and posterior regions.
All implants should be placed using a flapless surgical protocol with delayed loading protocol.
The clinical evaluation included peri-implant soft tissue parameters in patients records such as plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, and probing pocket depth to monitor peri-implant health. Also, prosthesis-related factors, including stability, retention, and occlusion, were also evaluated and recorded. In addition, implant status were evaluated and recorded through mobility testing and the presence of peri-implant infection or suppuration .
Marginal bone loss (vertically and horizontally) is measured on the mesial and distal sides of each dental implant on the periapical radiographs by using the software program (Scanora light version 3.2.6; SOREDEX) calibration.
Vertical bone height (AB) is considered as the distance between the implant shoulder and the bone-to-implant contact parallel to the implant long axis. Radiographic vertical bone loss (VBL) is estimated by subtracting radiographic AB at T6 and T12 from AB at T0.
Actual VBL is calculated by multiplying the actual implant length by the radiographic VBL and dividing the result by the radiographic length of the implant to account for magnification error.
To measure the horizontal alveolar bone loss (HBL), the distance between the peri- implant bone level (C point of crest) [which is the crossing Point of the tangent to the horizontal bone crest (CD line) and the tangent to the crater-shaped defect (CB line)] and the implant at the (E Point) right angle is measured and referred to the horizontal bone level. To measure horizontal bone loss (HBL), the horizontal bone level at T6 and T12 is subtracted from T0.
Actual HBL is calculated by multiplying the actual implant diameter by the radiographic HBL and dividing the result by the radiographic diameter of the implant in order to account for magnification error.
Data are analyzed using statistical software (SPSS, version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The Shapiro-Wilk test is used to assess the normality of the bone loss data. Descriptive statistics are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to evaluate changes in bone loss over time, followed by the Tukey Post hoc test for pairwise comparisons between time intervals. Intergroup differences are assessed using the independent samples t test. A P value <.05 is considered statistically significant at a 95% confidence level.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
40 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal