Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety (EFIPPS)

University of Dundee

Status: Completed

Conditions: Complications of Surgical and Medical Care: General Terms

Treatments: Other: Feedback of Performance + Health Psychology Informed Intervention; Other: Feedback of Performance; Other: Usual care

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01602705

2010PS06

Details and patient eligibility

About

We hypothesise that feedback and feedback + psychology informed intervention delivered to primary care medical practices will reduce high-risk prescribing to patients compared to a simple educational intervention alone. The specific objectives are :

1. To test the effectiveness of the two EFIPPS feedback arms in reducing the specified primary outcome of a composite measure of high-risk antipsychotic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and antiplatelet drug prescribing
2. To test the effectiveness of the two EFIPPS feedback arms in reducing the specified secondary outcomes of the six individual measures constituting the composite
3. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention

Full description

High risk prescribing is the use of drugs which carry significant risk to patients. Such prescribing is not always inappropriate but does require regular review to ensure that the balance of risk and benefit in individuals is appropriate. High risk prescribing is common and varies widely between practices, and there is evidence that intensive interventions (for example, pharmacist led medication review) can reduce rates of high risk prescribing. The aim of this study is to test whether a simpler and therefore cheaper feedback intervention can reduce high risk prescribing. The study is a three arm cluster randomised trial with primary care medical practices as the unit of randomisation and outcomes measured at patient level using routinely held prescribing for individual patients. The trial will compare two forms of feedback of practice rates of high risk prescribing with usual care. Usual care matches existing NHS working practice. The first active arm will receive quarterly feedback. The second active arm will receive the same feedback plus a health psychology informed intervention designed to promote response to feedback embedded in the feedback.

Enrollment: 262 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• General medical practices in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Lothian

Exclusion criteria

• Practices with <250 registered patients
• Practices with <93% of scripts in the new PIS data warehouse having a unique patient identifier (the Community Health Index [CHI] number)
• Practices which were formed after 1st January 2011
• Practices which cease to exist during the trial
• Practices which merge during the trial, where the merging practices were originally in different arms of the trial

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

262 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group

Usual care

Placebo Comparator group

Treatment:

Other: Usual care

Usual care + feedback of practice performance

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Other: Feedback of Performance

Usual care + feedback + health psychology intervention

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Other: Feedback of Performance + Health Psychology Informed Intervention