ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness and Safety Confirmation Between FASTSEAL® Bioabsorbable VCD and Perclose® ProGlide SMC System

T

Taewoong Medical

Status and phase

Terminated
Phase 3

Conditions

The Patients Who Needed Hemostasis at the Puncture Site of Common Femoral Artety(CFA) Caused by Femoral Angiogram or Intervention After the Catheter Removal

Treatments

Device: Vascular Closure Device

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT01597570
FASTSEAL® VCD

Details and patient eligibility

About

It is purposed to verify a superiority of the Fastseal® Bioabsorbable Vascular Access Closure System through effectiveness and safety confirmation of hemostasis (TTH; Time to hemstasis) and ambulation (TTA; Time to ambulation) at the puncture site of common femoral artery (CFA) after the procedures of Fastseal® Biosorbable Vascular Access Closure System or Perclose® ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System during 1 month observation.

Full description

Prospective, Single blind, randomized

Comparative study using the Fastseal® Bioabsorbable Vascular Access Closure System as an investigational device and the Perclose® ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System as a comparator.

After going through the confirmation of inclusion/exclusion criteria with signed subjects, they will have a procedure either of the two devices. The subjects should follow designated physician's instructions accurately during the clinical trial period.There are about 6 times evaluations Including screening.

Enrollment

52 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 20 years old and 85 years old, randomized
  • Patient who submitted a written informed consent for the this trial
  • The subjects should be scheduled to have an angiography or intervention through the common femoral artery (CFA).
  • The subjects must be used a 6Fr sheath of the Terumo's RadiFocus Introducer II.

Exclusion criteria

  • In case of the subject has a functure site in both legs.
  • The patient who had the closing device insertion or manual compression at the targeted femoral artery within 30 days
  • Patients with severe bleeding disorders (Severe bleeding history, blood coagulation disorder, thrombocytopenia (under 100,000 of platelet count), hemophilia, anemia (Hgb<10g/dL, Hct<30%), Thrombasthenia, any related bleeding disorder
  • Hypertension patient BP ≥180/110mmHg
  • In case of thrombolysis(ex: streptokinase, urokinase, t-PA) within 24hr
  • If there is any hematoma, arteriovenous fistula(AVF), false aneurysm existed at the access site of femoral artery
  • Severe obesity BMI > 40kg/m2
  • In case of prior stent placement or artificial vessel insertion in the common femoral artery(CFA)
  • Under 5mm of Common femoral artery (CFA) diameter

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

52 participants in 2 patient groups

FASTSEAL® Bioabsorbable VCD
Experimental group
Description:
Fastseal® Bioabsorbable Vascular Access Closure System
Treatment:
Device: Vascular Closure Device
Perclose® ProGlide SMC System
Active Comparator group
Description:
Perclose® ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System
Treatment:
Device: Vascular Closure Device

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems