ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Impregnated Gauze Versus Povidone Iodine Dressing in Post Trauma Wound Care

P

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Wound Healing
Wound Infection Post-Traumatic

Treatments

Procedure: Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze
Procedure: Povidone iodine dressing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07456072
No.F.1-1/2015/ERB/SZABMU/1482

Details and patient eligibility

About

To compare rate of infection and wound healing between chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze and dry povidone-iodine dressings in post-traumatic wounds.

Enrollment

176 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18-65 years of age with acute post-trauma wounds.
  • Wounds that are clean contaminated at presentation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with the known allergies to Chlorhexidine or Povidone-Iodine.
  • Chronic wounds or those with underlying chronic conditions, such as diabetes.
  • Patients with compromised immune systems.
  • Pregnant females

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

176 participants in 2 patient groups

Povidone iodine group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: Povidone iodine dressing
Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze group
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems