Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is a two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study in Chinese residential dementia care. Phase I is a pragmatic 1:1 exploratory pilot cluster randomized trial in six nursing homes in Zhengzhou, China, comparing staff-mediated doll therapy plus routine nursing care with routine nursing care alone among 142 residents with dementia assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Registered primary outcomes are class-specific daily medication-dose trajectories for antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants. Secondary and contextual outcomes include behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, activities of daily living, cognitive enhancer use, traditional Chinese medicine use, and doll engagement/adherence. Phase II uses semi-structured interviews with staff and family caregivers to explore acceptability, implementation, training needs, cultural fit, and ethical considerations.
Full description
Doll therapy is a person-centered, attachment-informed non-pharmacological intervention in which a person living with dementia is offered a lifelike doll and may interact with it by holding, comforting, grooming, or talking to it. This exploratory pilot and feasibility mixed-methods cluster randomized trial evaluates a staff-mediated doll-therapy care package in Chinese nursing homes. Intervention homes receive staff training, a structured introduction to a personal doll, relational engagement during routine care, and ongoing monitoring of resident assent, dissent, distress, and fit. Control homes provide routine nursing care alone. Quantitative assessments are conducted at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Medication-related outcomes are interpreted as indirect health-service and medication-burden signals rather than as direct evidence of prescribing causation. Behavioral, functional, contextual medication, traditional Chinese medicine, and engagement measures are interpreted alongside qualitative interviews with staff and family caregivers to understand implementation, acceptability, cultural fit, and ethical safeguards. Because only six clusters are randomized, the study is intended to generate feasibility information, preliminary effect estimates, and implementation signals rather than definitive clinical-effect evidence.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
142 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Zhenti Cui
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal