Infiltration Anesthesia vs. Block Anesthesia (LAI)

Sinan A. Shwailiya

Status

Completed

Conditions

Tooth Extraction

Treatments

Procedure: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Procedure: Infiltration with Articain 4%

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06766981

35/2024

Details and patient eligibility

About

Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction

Full description

Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 58 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

The systemic condition must be normal.
Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
The tooth is non-restorable.

Exclusion criteria

Chronic cardiovascular condition, metabolic, or infectious disease.
Pregnant women.
The tooth is restorable.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Block

Active Comparator group

Description:

This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction.

Treatment:

Procedure: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Infiltration

Experimental group

Description:

This group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration for tooth extraction

Treatment:

Procedure: Infiltration with Articain 4%