ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Pediatric Intubation (PETI)

I

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Treatments

Device: Venner
Device: Miller

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02289651
ETI/2014/12

Details and patient eligibility

About

We hypothesized that the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.

Enrollment

80 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • minimum 1 year of work experience in nursing

Exclusion criteria

  • Not meet the above criteria
  • Wrist or Low back diseases

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

80 participants in 2 patient groups

Intubation without chest compressions
Experimental group
Description:
Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions.
Treatment:
Device: Miller
Device: Venner
Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions
Experimental group
Description:
Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.).
Treatment:
Device: Miller
Device: Venner

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Andrzej Kurowski

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems