ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Neuromodulation vs Pharmacological Treatment in Cancer Patients With Anterior Knee Pain

U

Universidad Europea de Canarias

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Pain Cancer

Treatments

Device: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)
Drug: pharmacological treatment by Opioids

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06240390
22109-2

Details and patient eligibility

About

the goal of this clinical trial is to compare in cancer patients:

Is ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation useful for Anterior Knee Pain relief in cancer patients?

Participants will receive treatments of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation and pharmacological treatment Researchers will compare ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation versus pharmacological treatment to see if Anterior Knee Pain is reduced

Full description

Unhealthy lifestyles, an aging population and increased life expectancy increase the likelihood of cancer. Knee pain is one of the most common symptoms that cause functional incapacity, which requires the search and improvement of its assessment, prevention and treatment tools.

Physiotherapists are currently using ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation clinically. It is an easy process to perform, non-invasive, safe and economical.

Traditional therapies have been and will continue to be useful. The decrease in manufacturing costs of assessment tools such as ultrasound and neuromodulator treatment in recent years has made the acquisition of these equipment as intervention tools economical. This is because they have been shown to be useful for improving function and reducing pain.

Opioid analgesics are the main option for pain treatment in cancer patients, but their side effects and inadequate treatment lead to cheaper, quicker options with lower risk of addiction and/or side effects.

In order to improve these symptoms, it is essential to have an objective knowledge of the changes produced by neuromodulation and to be able to measure the variation of pain experienced by patients.

It has been demonstrated in recent years that assessment tools such as ultrasound and myotonometer are very useful, safe and non-invasive procedures, both have been consolidated as assessment tools that can evaluate changes and analyze the contractile properties of soft tissue quickly and safely. There are abundant literature on this subject.

Therefore, researchers suggest conducting research that improves and provides new data on the efficacy and effectiveness of treatment of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

The proposed inclusion criteria for the study are as follows:

  • Age between 18 and 65.
  • Pain in the front of the knee.
  • Taking drug therapy for lower-extremity pain.
  • Diagnosis of painful pathology in the anterior aspect of the knee secondary oncologic.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria are:

  • Traumatic history
  • Have had any type of analgesic treatment in the last 4 weeks (clinical, physical or orthostatic)
  • No need for drug treatment within the last 30 days of study initiation.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Epte Bipolar System 2.0 - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)
Experimental group
Description:
Epte Bipolar System is a medical device for health professionals that combines several techniques that extend the therapeutic variety of electrostimulation, for the treatment of different pathologies of the musculoskeletal system and peripheral and central nervous system. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)
Treatment:
Device: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)
pharmacological treatment by Opioids
Experimental group
Description:
Opioid analgesics are the main option for pain treatment in cancer patients, but their side effects and inadequate treatment lead to cheaper, quicker options with lower risk of addiction and/or side effects. Tramadol (Ultram®) Hydromorphone (Dilaudid®) Methadone (Dolophine®, Methadose®) Morphine (Apokyn®, Avinza®, Kadian®, MS-Contin®, among others) Oxycodone (OxyContin®, OxyIR®, Roxicodone®) Hydrocodone Oxymorphone (Opana®) Fentanyl (Actiq®, Duragesic®, Fentora®, Lazanda®, Subsys®, and others) Tapentadol (Nucynta®)
Treatment:
Drug: pharmacological treatment by Opioids

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Eduardo Martín, MsC; Eduardo Luis Martín Javier, MsC

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems