ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction Using Inertial Exercises

U

University in Zielona Góra

Status

Completed

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Treatments

Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction
Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction plus inertial exercises

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06726044
University of Zielona Gora

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of two rehabilitation protocols for patients following ACL reconstruction. The first group (SR) underwent standard rehabilitation, which included the following treatments:

Manual therapy: manual mobilization of the patella and fibular head Anti-swelling therapy: manual lymphatic drainage techniques Compression and cryotherapy Reflex therapy: clavi-therapy Kinesiotherapy: strength exercises Kinesiotaping Osteopathic techniques Myofascial release Manual scar treatment Activation of gliding movement in the knee joint; soft tissue techniques in the popliteal region Flossing Knee flexion and extension exercises in a closed and next in open kinematic chain Isometric quadriceps exercises at full extension and 45-degree flexion

In addition to the above, the second group (SR+I) performed inertial exercises, which were introduced starting from the fifth week of rehabilitation. After 12 weeks of rehabilitation, its effectiveness was evaluated using standard tests.

The results indicate that the innovative rehabilitation protocol incorporating inertial exercises can be effectively applied in the rehabilitation of individuals following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. None of the monitored rehabilitation effectiveness indicators in the SR+I group were inferior to those in the SR group. Moreover, certain parameters assessing rehabilitation effectiveness showed the SR+I protocol to have advantages over the SR protocol.

Full description

The primary goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness of two rehabilitation protocols in patients following ACL reconstruction. The first group (SR), consisting of 12 participants, underwent a standard rehabilitation program twice a week for 12 weeks. Each session lasted approximately 60 minutes and was conducted by the same therapist. The standard rehabilitation program included the following treatments:

Manual therapy: manual mobilization of the patella and fibular head Anti-swelling therapy: manual lymphatic drainage techniques Compression and cryotherapy Reflex therapy: clavi-therapy Kinesiotherapy: strength exercises Kinesiotaping Osteopathic techniques Myofascial release Manual scar treatment Activation of gliding movement in the knee joint; soft tissue techniques in the popliteal region Flossing Knee flexion and extension exercises in closed kinematic chains The same in open kinematic chains Isometric quadriceps exercises at full extension and 45-degree flexion

The second group (SR+I) followed the same standard protocol but also performed inertial exercises from the fifth week of rehabilitation. These exercises were conducted on an InerKnee setup, adapted from the Cyklotren device, and began four weeks post-surgery, provided the patient achieved at least 90 degrees of knee flexion (including full extension). The inertial exercises protocol included:

knee extension exercises performed in a seated position for the operated leg 4 sets of exercises, each lasting 15 seconds individually adjusted resistance to maintain a 1-second extension cycle passive rest periods of 2 minutes between sets

After 12 weeks of rehabilitation, effectiveness was evaluated using standard tests. The results showed that the innovative rehabilitation protocol, incorporating inertial exercises, can be effectively applied to patients following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. No monitored indicators in the SR+I group were worse than those in the SR group. In fact, several parameters indicated the SR+I protocol's superiority over the standard protocol.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ACL reconstruction performed by the same doctor using similar technique, lack of other disases, minimum 90% attendance in rehabilitation sessions

Exclusion criteria

  • other chronic disases, rehabilitation was not completed, other injury during rehabilitation

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

24 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard rehabilitation
Active Comparator group
Description:
12 subjects after ACL reconstruction. Subjects participated in standard rehabilitation program twice a week for 12 weeks. Each session lasted approximately 60 minutes.
Treatment:
Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction plus inertial exercises
Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction
Standard rehabilitation and inertial exercises
Experimental group
Description:
12 subjects after ACL reconstruction. Subjects participated in standard rehabilitation program twice a week for 12 weeks and additionally performed inertial exercises from the fifth week of rehabilitation. Then each session lasted approximately 70 minutes.
Treatment:
Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction plus inertial exercises
Other: Standard rehabilitaion after ACL reconstruction

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems