Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Daily respiratory physiotherapy is a fundamental part of cystic fibrosis treatment, however, patients adherence is low. Thus, there is a need for studies that evaluate the impact of physiotherapy supervision in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), with particular emphasis on the effectiveness of telemonitoring. A quantitative, pre-experimental, single-centre study was designed involving the universe of patients with CF from Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital to measure frequency of exacerbations, pulmonary function and quality of life, before and after remote respiratory physiotherapy intervention via videoconference platform for 6 months.
Full description
This study evaluated the effectiveness of remote respiratory physiotherapy delivered via a videoconferencing platform for children aged 6 to 18 years with cystic fibrosis, who were followed at Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital. Cystic fibrosis is a chronic respiratory disease that requires interdisciplinary management from the time of diagnosis, with respiratory physiotherapy being a cornerstone of treatment. Despite its importance, adherence is often low, especially for home-based care. Therefore, the study aimed to determine whether remote supervision could improve key clinical outcomes such as exacerbation frequency, pulmonary function, and quality of life.
The study followed a quantitative, pre-experimental, single-center design, with a non-probabilistic convenience sample. Although the initial target sample size was 16, the final study population included 9 patients, all diagnosed through a sweat test and enrolled in the National Cystic Fibrosis Program. The intervention consisted of remote respiratory physiotherapy sessions, held three times per week for six months, led by a physiotherapist via videoconference. Each session included clinical assessment, airway clearance techniques, supervised use of inhaled medications, physical exercise, and general health education.
Outcomes were measured before and after the intervention. Primary outcomes included the frequency of respiratory exacerbations. Secondary outcomes were lung function (measured by FEV1 and FVC), health-related quality of life (assessed using the PedsQL™ questionnaire), exercise capacity (via the six-minute walk test), days of hospitalization and antibiotic use, treatment adherence, and adverse events. All measurements were performed by trained, blinded professionals according to established clinical standards.
Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 14.2. Data distribution was assessed to select appropriate tests: paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used for continuous variables, and McNemar's test was applied to categorical variables. A significance level of 0.05 was used, and results were presented with 95% confidence intervals. All adverse events were documented, including their characteristics, resolution, severity, and potential relation to the intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
9 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal