ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Rubber Dam Isolation Versus Cotton Roll Isolation on Bonded Fissure Sealant Retention

Z

Zafer Cavit Cehreli, DDS, PhD

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Dental Caries on Pit and Fissure Surface
Dental Caries in Children
Dental Leakage

Treatments

Device: Dental Cotton Roll
Device: Rubber Dam Set

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03886727
RDI vs cotton roll

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical retention of bonded fissure sealants placed under rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

6 to 16 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Teeth having a clinical indication of sealing with bonded resin pit and fissure sealants
  • Patients with four fully-erupted permanent molars, with unstained, caries-free and unsealed pit and fissures

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients having incipient carious lesions, fewer erupted molars or teeth without pits on buccal/palatal surfaces.
  • Patients with systemic diseases.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Rubber Dam
Active Comparator group
Description:
Isolation of single tooth using rubber dam
Treatment:
Device: Rubber Dam Set
Cotton Roll
Active Comparator group
Description:
Isolation of quadrant using cotton rolls
Treatment:
Device: Dental Cotton Roll

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems