Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This blinded end point RCT will recruit high risk TIA and mild stroke patients (through the emergency TIA clinics and the acute stroke services at the Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital) who require anti-hypertensive therapy to examine the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-monitoring and self management of Blood Pressure compared to self monitoring alone and treatment as usual.
Full description
Research Question: In patients with a mild/moderate stroke or TIA who require drug treatment for BP control, does BP self-monitoring with or without patient-led management using a previously agreed treatment regime result in better BP control and patient satisfaction than standard GP based management?
Planned sample size: 165 eligible participants distributed 1:1:1 between three groups. Group 1 (control) - treatment as usual (TAU). Group 2 - Self-monitoring only (Se-MO). Group 3 - Self-monitoring and self-management (Se-Man).
Primary outcome: Number reaching target Ambulatory BP levels at follow-up and change in mean Ambulatory BP levels between baseline and follow-up at 6 months.
Secondary outcomes:
Number of changes in anti-hypertensive treatment during study Side-effects profiles and adverse events BP variability Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) changes All cause and cause-specific mortality outcome at six month Recurrent TIA or stroke Incident CVD- stroke, TIA and myocardial infarction Costs Health related quality of life assessed Quality Adjusted Life Years (EQ-5D based) Patient satisfaction and experience of the process (qualitative data)
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
165 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal