Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Safe Haven app in reducing mental health symptoms and enhancing mental health literacy in undergraduates at a national university in southern Taiwan. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the Safe Haven app lead to significantly greater reductions in general psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress compared to standard campus care?
Does the app result in greater improvements in mental health literacy among participants?
Researchers will compare an experimental group (receiving the Safe Haven app in addition to standard campus care) to a waitlist control group (receiving standard campus care only) to see if the intervention provides superior improvements in mental health outcomes over time.
Participants will:
Complete online assessments at three time points: baseline (T0), post-intervention (3 months, T1), and follow-up (3 months post-intervention, T2).
Experimental Group: Download the Safe Haven app to complete daily mood self-monitoring and weekly assessments, and receive psychoeducational content, personalized suggestions for 3 months.
Control Group: Maintain access to standard campus care and receive access to the app after the final follow-up assessment.
Full description
Background: Undergraduates face a critical transition period marked by significant stressors and a high prevalence of mental health issues. However, help-seeking behaviors remain low due to stigma and structural barriers. While mobile health (mHealth) apps offer a scalable solution, existing interventions often rely on static content and lack real-time responsiveness to students' fluctuating psychological states. This study introduces "Safe Haven," a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention (JITAI) system that integrates self-monitoring with risk stratification to provide tailored support. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Safe Haven app in reducing psychological distress and enhancing mental health literacy compared to standard campus care alone.
Study Design: This study employs a parallel-group, two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 68 eligible undergraduate students from a national university in southern Taiwan will be recruited. After completing baseline assessments (T0), participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the Experimental Group or the Waitlist Control Group.
Intervention Details
Experimental Group (Safe Haven App + TAU): Participants in this group will receive access to the Safe Haven app for a duration of 3 months, in addition to maintaining full access to standard on-campus counseling and mental health services (Treatment-as-Usual, TAU). The Safe Haven app includes five core components:
Waitlist Control Group (TAU Only): Participants in this group will maintain access to standard on-campus counseling and mental health services (TAU) but will not access the Safe Haven app during the 3-month intervention period. To ensure ethical standards, these participants will be offered access to the Safe Haven app after completing the final follow-up assessment (T2).
Study Procedures Data collection will occur at three time points:
Outcome Measures The primary outcomes are changes in general psychological distress (measured by CHQ-12) and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress (measured by DASS-21). Secondary outcomes include changes in mental health literacy (measured by MHLS-HPG) and intervention engagement (measured by app usage logs and SUS scores).
Statistical Analysis Plan Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The primary analysis will follow the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) principle. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) will be utilized to examine longitudinal changes and test the Group × Time interaction effect on outcome measures. GEE models will be adjusted for baseline scores of the respective outcome variables. Additionally, any demographic characteristics showing statistically significant differences between groups at baseline will be included as covariates. For the experimental group, further analyses will examine the association between objective engagement metrics (e.g., completion rates) and clinical improvements to determine dose-response relationships.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
68 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ching-Lan Lin; Jou-Ting Lin
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal